by Calculated Risk on 10/22/2014 08:30:00 AM
Wednesday, October 22, 2014
BLS: CPI increases 0.1% in September, Core CPI 0.1%, Cost-Of-Living Adjustment 1.7%
The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) increased 0.1 percent in September on a seasonally adjusted basis, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Over the last 12 months, the all items index increased 1.7 percent before seasonal adjustment.I'll post a graph later today after the Cleveland Fed releases the median and trimmed-mean CPI. This was close to the consensus forecast of no change for CPI, and a 0.1% increase in core CPI.
...
The index for all items less food and energy increased 0.1 percent in September. ... The 12-month change in the index for all items less food and energy also remained at 1.7 percent.
Cost-Of-Living Adjustment (COLA): The BLS reported CPI-W increased to 234.170 in September, for a Q3 average of 234.242. In Q3 2013, CPI-W average 230.33. The annual Social Security Cost-Of-Living Adjustment will be 1.7%.
MBA: Mortgage Applications Increase in Latest MBA Weekly Survey
by Calculated Risk on 10/22/2014 07:00:00 AM
From the MBA: Mortgage Applications Increase in Latest MBA Weekly Survey
Mortgage applications increased 11.6 percent from one week earlier, according to data from the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey for the week ending October 17, 2014. This week’s results did not include an adjustment for the Columbus Day holiday. ...
The Refinance Index increased 23 percent from the previous week to the highest level since November 2013. The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index decreased 5 percent from one week earlier....
...
“Continuing concerns about weak economic growth in Europe and a few US economic indicators that came in below expectations caused a flight to quality into US Treasuries last week, leading to sharp drops in interest rates,” said Mike Fratantoni, MBA’s Chief Economist. “Mortgage rates have fallen close to 30 basis points over the last four weeks. Refinance application volume reached the highest level since November 2013 as a result, and the average loan balance for refinance applications increased to $306,400, the highest level in the survey’s history.”
...
The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages with conforming loan balances ($417,000 or less) decreased to 4.10 percent, the lowest level since May 2013, from 4.20 percent, with points increasing to 0.21 from 0.17 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent loan-to-value ratio (LTV) loans.
emphasis added
The first graph shows the refinance index.
The refinance index is down 66% from the levels in May 2013.
Even with the recent increase in activity - as people who purchased in the last year or so refinance - refinance activity is very low this year and 2014 will be the lowest since year 2000.
According to the MBA, the unadjusted purchase index is down about 9% from a year ago.
Tuesday, October 21, 2014
Wednesday: Consumer Price Index
by Calculated Risk on 10/21/2014 08:42:00 PM
Here is a forecast for 2015 from the MBA: MBA Sees Originations Increasing Seven Percent in 2015
The Mortgage Bankers Association announced today that it expects to see $1.19 trillion in mortgage originations during 2015, a seven percent increase from 2014. While MBA anticipates purchase originations will increase 15 percent, it expects refinance originations to decrease three percent.Wednesday:
MBA’s forecast predicts purchase originations will increase to $731 billion in 2015, up from $635 billion in 2014. In contrast, refinances are expected to drop to $457 billion, from $471 billion, in 2014.
For 2016, MBA is forecasting purchase originations of $791 billion and refinance originations of $379 billion for a total of $1.17 trillion.
“We are projecting that home purchase originations will increase in 2015 as the US economy continues on its current path of stronger growth, job gains and declining unemployment. The job market has shown sustained improvement this year; with robust monthly increases in both payroll jobs and job openings,” said Michael Fratantoni, MBA’s Chief Economist and Senior Vice President for Research and Industry Technology. “We are forecasting that strong job growth, coupled with still low mortgage rates, should translate to an increase in home sales and purchase originations.
emphasis added
• At 7:00 AM ET, the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) will release the results for the mortgage purchase applications index.
• At 8:30 AM, the Consumer Price Index for September. The consensus is for no change in CPI in September and for core CPI to increase 0.1%.
NOTE: When CPI is released on Wednesday, the Cost-of-living adjustment for 2015 will be released. If CPI-W is unchanged in September, COLA will be around 1.7%.
• During the day, the AIA's Architecture Billings Index for September (a leading indicator for commercial real estate).
DataQuick: California Foreclosure Starts Lowest Since 2005
by Calculated Risk on 10/21/2014 05:42:00 PM
From DataQuick: Golden State Foreclosure Starts Continue to Decline
Lending institutions initiated formal foreclosure proceedings last quarter on the lowest number of California homes in more than eight years, the result of a recovering real estate market and the dwindling pool of toxic home loans made in 2006 and 2007, Irvine-based CoreLogic DataQuick reported.
A total of 16,833 Notices of Default (NoDs) were recorded at county recorders offices during the July-through-September period. That was down 3.9 percent from 17,524 for the prior quarter, and down 17.1 percent from 20,314 in third-quarter 2013, according to CoreLogic DataQuick data.
Last quarter's NoD tally was the lowest since fourth-quarter 2005, when 15,337 NoDs were recorded. NoDs peaked in first-quarter 2009 at 135,431, while the low was 12,417 NoDs in third-quarter 2004. The NoD statistics go back to 1992.
...
"This home repo pipeline isn't exactly drying up, but it sure is diminishing. Its negative effect on the overall market is only a fraction of what it was several years ago, and is really only still noticeable in some pockets of the hardest-hit markets of the Inland Empire and Central Valley," said John Karevoll, a CoreLogic DataQuick analyst.
To some extent the level of NoD filings in recent quarters probably reflects the rate at which servicers are able to process paperwork. The 20,314 NoDs filed in third-quarter 2013 were followed by 18,120 the following quarter and then 19,215 in 2014Q1; 17,524 in 2014Q2; and 16,833 last quarter.
Most of the loans going into default are still from the 2005-2007 period. Last quarter the median origination quarter for defaulted loans was third-quarter 2006. That has been the case for more than five years, indicating that weak underwriting standards peaked then.
emphasis added
This graph shows the number of Notices of Default (NoD) filed in California each year. 2014 is in red (estimate based on Q1, Q2 and Q3).
Last year was the lowest year for foreclosure starts since 2005, and 2013 was also below the levels in 1997 through 2000 when prices were rising following the much smaller late '80s housing bubble / early '90s bust in California.
Overall foreclosure starts are close to a normal level in California (foreclosure starts were over 50,000 in 2004 and 2005 when prices were rising quickly).
Note: Foreclosures are still higher than normal in states with a judicial foreclosure process.
LA area Port Traffic in September: Imports Highest since 2006, Exports Soft
by Calculated Risk on 10/21/2014 03:48:00 PM
Container traffic gives us an idea about the volume of goods being exported and imported - and possibly some hints about the trade report for September since LA area ports handle about 40% of the nation's container port traffic.
The following graphs are for inbound and outbound traffic at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach in TEUs (TEUs: 20-foot equivalent units or 20-foot-long cargo container).
To remove the strong seasonal component for inbound traffic, the first graph shows the rolling 12 month average.
Click on graph for larger image.
On a rolling 12 month basis, inbound traffic was up 0.9% compared to the rolling 12 months ending in August. Outbound traffic was down 0.4% compared to 12 months ending in August.
Inbound traffic has been increasing, and outbound traffic has been mostly moving sideways.
The 2nd graph is the monthly data (with a strong seasonal pattern for imports).
Usually imports peak in the July to October period as retailers import goods for the Christmas holiday, and then decline sharply and bottom in February or March (depending on the timing of the Chinese New Year).
Imports were up 10.6% year-over-year in September, exports were down 5.6% year-over-year.
This might suggest retailers are expecting a happy holiday season.
BLS: Thirty-one States had Unemployment Rate Decreases in September
by Calculated Risk on 10/21/2014 01:31:00 PM
From the BLS: Regional and State Employment and Unemployment Summary
Regional and state unemployment rates were generally little changed in September. Thirty-one states had unemployment rate decreases from August, 8 states had increases, and 11 states and the District of Columbia had no change, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today.
...
Georgia had the highest unemployment rate among the states in September, 7.9 percent. North Dakota again had the lowest jobless rate, 2.8 percent.
This graph shows the current unemployment rate for each state (red), and the max during the recession (blue). All states are well below the maximum unemployment rate for the recession.
The size of the blue bar indicates the amount of improvement.
The states are ranked by the highest current unemployment rate. Georgia had the highest unemployment rate in September at 7.9%.
Currently no state has an unemployment rate at or above 8% (light blue); Nine states are still at or above 7% (dark blue).
A Few Comments on September Existing Home Sales
by Calculated Risk on 10/21/2014 11:02:00 AM
A few comments ...
• Once again housing economist Tom Lawler's forecast of 5.14 million SAAR was closer than the consensus (5.05 million) to the NAR reported sales (5.17 million). It is getting harder for Lawler to beat the "consensus" because it appears several analysts are waiting for Lawler's estimate before submitting their own!
• "The sky is falling! The sky is falling!" Maybe not ... Remember those analysts who incorrectly claimed that declining year-over-year existing home sales were a sign that the "housing recovery" was over? That was wrong, and I correctly pointed out: 1) the "housing recovery" is mostly new home sales and housing starts - not existing home sales, 2) declining overall existing home sales were a positive if the decline was related to fewer distressed sales.
• The most important number in the NAR report each month is inventory. This morning the NAR reported that inventory was up 6.0% year-over-year in September. It is important to note that the NAR inventory data is "noisy" and difficult to forecast based on other data.
The headline NAR inventory number is not seasonally adjusted, even though there is a clear seasonal pattern. Trulia chief economist Jed Kolko has sent me the seasonally adjusted inventory. NOTE: The NAR does provide a seasonally adjusted months-of-supply, although that is in the supplemental data.
Click on graph for larger image.
This shows that inventory bottomed in January 2013 (on a seasonally adjusted basis), and inventory is now up about 12.5% from the bottom. On a seasonally adjusted basis, inventory was up 1.4% in September compared to August.
Important: The NAR reports active listings, and although there is some variability across the country in what is considered active, many "contingent short sales" are not included. "Contingent short sales" are strange listings since the listings were frequently NEVER on the market (they were listed as contingent), and they hang around for a long time - they are probably more closely related to shadow inventory than active inventory. However when we compare inventory to 2005, we need to remember there were no "short sale contingent" listings in 2005. In the areas I track, the number of "short sale contingent" listings is also down sharply year-over-year.
And it appears investor buying is declining year-over-year. From the NAR:
All-cash sales were 24 percent of transactions in September, up slightly from August (23 percent) but down from 33 percent in September of last year. Individual investors, who account for many cash sales, purchased 14 percent of homes in September, up from 12 percent last month but below September 2013 (19 percent). Sixty-three percent of investors paid cash in September.And another key point: The NAR reported total sales were down 1.7% from September 2013, but normal equity sales were probably up year-over-year, and distressed sales down sharply. From the NAR (from a survey that is far from perfect):
Distressed homes – foreclosures and short sales – increased slightly in September to 10 percent from 8 percent in August, but are down from 14 percent a year ago. Seven percent of September sales were foreclosures and 3 percent were short sales.Last year in September the NAR reported that 14% of sales were distressed sales.
A rough estimate: Sales in September 2013 were reported at 5.26 million SAAR with 14% distressed. That gives 740 thousand distressed (annual rate), and 4.52 million equity / non-distressed. In September 2014, sales were 5.17 million SAAR, with 10% distressed. That gives 520 thousand distressed - a decline of about 30% from September 2013 - and 4.65 million equity. Although this survey isn't perfect, this suggests distressed sales were down sharply - and normal sales up slightly.
The following graph shows existing home sales Not Seasonally Adjusted (NSA).
Sales NSA in September (red column) were at the highest level for September since 2006.
Overall this was a solid report.
Earlier:
• Existing Home Sales in September: 5.17 million SAAR, Inventory up 6.0% Year-over-year
Existing Home Sales in September: 5.17 million SAAR, Inventory up 6.0% Year-over-year
by Calculated Risk on 10/21/2014 10:00:00 AM
The NAR reports: Existing-Home Sales Rebound in September
Total existing-home sales, which are completed transactions that include single-family homes, townhomes, condominiums and co-ops, increased 2.4 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.17 million in September from 5.05 million in August. Sales are now at their highest pace of 2014, but still remain 1.7 percent below the 5.26 million-unit level from last September. ...
Total housing inventory at the end of September fell 1.3 percent to 2.30 million existing homes available for sale, which represents a 5.3-month supply at the current sales pace. Despite fewer homes for sale in September, unsold inventory is still 6.0 percent higher than a year ago, when there were 2.17 million existing homes available for sale.
This graph shows existing home sales, on a Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate (SAAR) basis since 1993.
Sales in September (5.17 million SAAR) were 2.4% higher than last month, and were 1.7% below the September 2013 rate.
The second graph shows nationwide inventory for existing homes.
The third graph shows the year-over-year (YoY) change in reported existing home inventory and months-of-supply. Since inventory is not seasonally adjusted, it really helps to look at the YoY change. Note: Months-of-supply is based on the seasonally adjusted sales and not seasonally adjusted inventory.
Months of supply was at 5.3 months in September.
This was above expectations of sales of 5.09 million. For existing home sales, the key number is inventory - and inventory is still low, but up year-over-year. I'll have more later ...
Monday, October 20, 2014
Tuesday: Existing Home Sales
by Calculated Risk on 10/20/2014 08:09:00 PM
From Dina ElBoghdady at the WaPo: How a top housing regulator plans to make it easier to get a mortgage. Excerpts:
It’s unclear if Watt's downpayment plan will do much to ease access to credit. The average downpayment remains lower today than it was in more normal, pre-housing bubble times, said Sam Khater, chief deputy economist at CoreLogic. That’s because the Federal Housing Administration – which backs loans with as little as 5 percent down -- has a larger share of the mortgage market than usual, Khater said. Having Fannie and Freddie also accept downpayments as low as 5 percent would only help on the fringes, Khater said.From David Stevens, MBA President: MBA’s Stevens Applauds FHFA Steps to Ease Credit for Homebuyers
...
Today, the average credit score on a loan backed by Fannie and Freddie is close to 745, versus about 710 in the early 2000s, according to Moody’s Analytics.
“Offering lenders better clarity around representation and warranty requirements will ensure lenders are accountable for any material mistakes they may make in the loan process, yet acknowledges the fact that minor, immaterial loan defects should not automatically trigger a repurchase request. As a result, lenders will be more confident in offering mortgages to qualified borrowers within the full boundaries of the GSEs’ credit requirements.Tuesday:
• At 10:00 AM, Existing Home Sales for September from the National Association of Realtors (NAR). The consensus is for sales of 5.09 million on seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) basis. Sales in August were at a 5.05 million SAAR. Economist Tom Lawler estimates the NAR will report sales of 5.14 million SAAR. A key will be the reported year-over-year increase in inventory of homes for sale.
• Also at 10:00 AM, Regional and State Employment and Unemployment (Monthly) for September 2014
Lawler: Updated Table of Distressed and All-Cash Share for September
by Calculated Risk on 10/20/2014 04:22:00 PM
CR Note: Existing Home Sales for September will be released tomorrow by the National Association of Realtors (NAR). The consensus is for sales of 5.09 million on seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) basis. Sales in August were at a 5.05 million SAAR. Economist Tom Lawler estimates the NAR will report sales of 5.14 million SAAR.
Housing economist Tom Lawler sent me the updated table below of short sales, foreclosures and cash buyers for several selected cities in September. Lawler notes: "Note the jump in the foreclosure sales share in Orlando."
On distressed: Total "distressed" share is down in these markets due to a decline in short sales.
Short sales are down in all these areas.
Foreclosures are up slightly in several of these areas - and up significantly in Orlando.
The All Cash Share (last two columns) is mostly declining year-over-year. As investors pull back, the share of all cash buyers will probably continue to decline.
| Short Sales Share | Foreclosure Sales Share | Total "Distressed" Share | All Cash Share | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep-14 | Sep-13 | Sep-14 | Sep-13 | Sep-14 | Sep-13 | Sep-14 | Sep-13 | |
| Las Vegas | 10.4% | 23.0% | 8.8% | 7.0% | 19.2% | 30.0% | 34.3% | 47.2% |
| Reno** | 7.0% | 20.0% | 7.0% | 5.0% | 14.0% | 25.0% | ||
| Phoenix | 3.8% | 8.8% | 5.8% | 8.0% | 9.6% | 16.8% | 25.7% | 33.4% |
| Sacramento | 5.3% | 12.1% | 6.5% | 3.9% | 11.8% | 16.0% | 19.4% | 23.6% |
| Minneapolis | 3.4% | 6.0% | 9.4% | 16.0% | 12.8% | 22.0% | ||
| Mid-Atlantic | 5.5% | 7.7% | 9.7% | 8.2% | 15.2% | 15.9% | 19.1% | 18.4% |
| Orlando | 7.1% | 18.0% | 24.8% | 18.0% | 31.8% | 36.0% | 41.9% | 43.5% |
| California * | 5.9% | 10.8% | 5.3% | 7.1% | 11.2% | 17.9% | ||
| Bay Area CA* | 3.6% | 7.5% | 2.8% | 3.6% | 6.4% | 11.1% | 20.9% | 23.3% |
| So. California* | 6.0% | 10.9% | 4.7% | 6.4% | 10.7% | 17.3% | 24.3% | 28.7% |
| Hampton Roads | 19.6% | 26.1% | ||||||
| Tucson | 26.7% | 29.8% | ||||||
| Toledo | 31.4% | 38.1% | ||||||
| Wichita | 27.8% | 28.6% | ||||||
| Des Moines | 16.8% | 19.2% | ||||||
| Peoria | 24.7% | 20.7% | ||||||
| Georgia*** | 27.4% | N/A | ||||||
| Omaha | 19.9% | 19.1% | ||||||
| Pensacola | 29.2% | 27.3% | ||||||
| Memphis* | 11.7% | 16.5% | ||||||
| Springfield IL** | 9.5% | 14.1% | 22.6% | N/A | ||||
| *share of existing home sales, based on property records **Single Family Only ***GAMLS | ||||||||
FHFA Director Watt: Reps and Warrants to be Clarified in Coming Weeks, "sensible and responsible guidelines" for Lower Downpayments
by Calculated Risk on 10/20/2014 02:56:00 PM
From FHFA Director Melvin Watt: Prepared Remarks of Melvin L. Watt, Director, FHFA, At the Mortgage Bankers Association Annual Convention
On lower downpayments:
To increase access for creditworthy but lower-wealth borrowers, FHFA is also working with the Enterprises to develop sensible and responsible guidelines for mortgages with loan-to-value ratios between 95 and 97 percent. Through these revised guidelines, we believe that the Enterprises will be able to responsibly serve a targeted segment of creditworthy borrowers with lower-down payment mortgages by taking into account “compensating factors.” While this is a much more narrow effort than our work on the Representation and Warranty Framework, it is yet another much needed piece to the broader access to credit puzzle. Further details about these new guidelines will be available in the coming weeks as we continue to advance FHFA’s mission of ensuring safety, soundness and liquidity in the housing finance markets.On Reps and Warrants:
We know that the Representation and Warranty Framework did not provide enough clarity to enable lenders to understand when Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac would exercise their remedy to require repurchase of a loan. And, we know that this issue has contributed to lenders imposing credit overlays that drive up the cost of lending and also restrict lending to borrowers with less than perfect credit scores or with less conventional financial situations.
To address this problem, FHFA and the Enterprises have worked to revise the Framework to ensure that it provides clear rules of the road that allow lenders to manage their risk and lend throughout the Enterprises’ credit box. These revisions are consistent with our broader efforts to place more emphasis on upfront quality control reviews and other risk management practices that provide feedback on the quality of loans delivered to the Enterprises earlier in the process.
...
As I committed FHFA to do when I announced these refinements in May, we have continued to engage in an ongoing process to address the issue of life-of-loan exclusions. Life-of-loan exclusions are designed to protect Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from instances of fraud or other significant noncompliance, and, as a result, they allow the Enterprises to require lenders to repurchase loans at any point during the term of the loan. The current life-of-loan exclusions are open-ended and make it difficult for a lender to predict when, or if, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac will apply one of them.
So, we have continued to address this issue, and I can report that we have reached an agreement in principle on how to clarify and define the life-of-loan exclusions. These changes are a significant step forward that will result in a better Representation and Warranty Framework and facilitate market liquidity without compromising the safety and soundness of the Enterprises.
First, we are more clearly defining the life-of-loan exclusions, so lenders will know what they are and when they apply to loans that have otherwise obtained repurchase relief. These exclusions fall into six categories: 1) misrepresentations, misstatements and omissions; 2) data inaccuracies; 3) charter compliance issues; 4) first-lien priority and title matters; 5) legal compliance violations; and 6) unacceptable mortgage products.
Second, for loans that have already earned repurchase relief, we are clarifying that only life-of-loan exclusions can trigger a repurchase under the Framework. This is a straightforward clarification, but one that we believe will reduce confusion and risks to lenders.
The Enterprises will provide details about the updated definitions for each life-of-loan exclusion in the coming weeks ...
emphasis added
Is Mortgage Credit too Tight?
by Calculated Risk on 10/20/2014 11:04:00 AM
I frequently hear stories from prime borrowers about their horrible experiences getting mortgages right now. Yes, the process is difficult because of all the extra checks because the lenders are afraid the loans will be put back to them in a few years.
At the same time, loan officers are telling me it is easy for prime borrowers to get a loan.
This isn't a contradiction - an onerous process isn't "tight credit", it is just risk management. But that is for prime borrowers.
First, here is a piece today from Mark Fleming, chief economist at CoreLogic, writes: Is Credit Too Tight, Too Loose or Just Right?
One of the most pressing issues in housing finance today is the availability of credit. The lack of access to credit has been cited as a reason for the slower-than-hoped-for growth in home sales. The often cited Federal Reserve Loan Officer Survey tells us whether lenders are tightening or loosening credit, but tells us much less about the overall level of availability of credit. Furthermore, terms like tight credit or loose credit imply a normative goal of the right amount of credit. In fact, when discussing this topic, one can’t help but think of Goldilocks and the Three Bears: one bed is too hard, another too soft, and the last one is just right.
In order to determine whether credit is too tight, too loose, or just right CoreLogic has developed the Housing Credit Index (HCI) that measures the range and variation of residential mortgage credit over time and multiple housing credit underwriting attributes. The index includes attributes that are relevant to the assessment of credit risk for a borrower applying for credit. ...

So is credit currently too loose, too tight or just right? In Figure 1, the HCI is shown from 1998 to early 2014 measured on the left axis along with the overall serious delinquency rate measured on the right axis. In the refinance boom of the early aughts, credit availability expanded significantly and then declined, but to a level moderately elevated compared to before the refinance boom. The result of increased credit availability was a modest rise from about 1 percent to 1.25 percent in the overall serious delinquency rate. The mid-aughts saw the significant expansion of credit to double the normal level and the very quick and dramatic contraction with which we are all far too familiar. Credit availability reached its tightest point in late 2010 at only one-third the normal level of the late 1990s. It is safe to say that credit was too tight. Of course, this was a natural response to the quickly rising serious delinquency rate that turned upward dramatically starting in 2006. Since 2010 credit availability has eased in fits and starts with the utilization of modification and refinance programs aimed at struggling homeowners. Most recently, the index is indicating a slight easing, but remains tight by historic standards.According to the CoreLogic index, credit is easing a little, but remains tight.
emphasis added
Below are some other measures. Note: Some less qualified borrowers are using FHA, but that involves high fees (high G-Fees), and the share of FHA loans is at the lowest level in 5 years according to Campbell/Inside Mortgage Finance HousingPulse. But most less qualified borrowers just can't qualify now. Two indicators of this are:
As Black Knight notes: "The share of purchase originations with high borrower credit scores is at an all time high". This suggests credit is tight for less qualified borrowers.
This graph only includes loans originated in 2005 through 2014, but older data shows the recent loans are the best performing ever. The loan performance suggests lending is currently tight (I believe this is better loan performance than even during the 2001 through 2005 period when house prices were rising quickly).
DOT: Vehicle Miles Driven increased 0.4% year-over-year in August
by Calculated Risk on 10/20/2014 08:58:00 AM
The Department of Transportation (DOT) reported:
Travel on all roads and streets changed by 0.4% (1.0 billion vehicle miles) for August 2014 as compared with August 2013.The following graph shows the rolling 12 month total vehicle miles driven.
Travel for the month is estimated to be 267.8 billion vehicle miles.
Cumulative Travel for 2014 changed by 0.6% (11.1 billion vehicle miles).
The rolling 12 month total is still mostly moving sideways ...
In the early '80s, miles driven (rolling 12 months) stayed below the previous peak for 39 months.
Currently miles driven has been below the previous peak for 81 months - almost 7 years - and still counting. Currently miles driven (rolling 12 months) are about 2.0% below the previous peak.
The second graph shows the year-over-year change from the same month in the previous year.
Prices will really be down year-over-year for September and October.
Of course gasoline prices are just part of the story. The lack of growth in miles driven over the last 7 years is probably also due to the lingering effects of the great recession (high unemployment rate and lack of wage growth), the aging of the overall population (over 55 drivers drive fewer miles) and changing driving habits of young drivers.
With all these factors, it might take a few more years before we see a new peak in miles driven - but it does seem like miles driven is now increasing.
Sunday, October 19, 2014
Sunday Night Futures
by Calculated Risk on 10/19/2014 09:01:00 PM
From Merrill Lynch on Oil:
The plunge in oil prices, if it proves persistent, could end up being the big economic story. Energy prices have fallen very sharply in the past three months. Brent oil prices have declined from around $110/bbl in July to $86/bbl as this goes to print. It takes a few weeks for the full pass-through to gasoline and other refined products, but this would imply a drop of about 70 cents for a gallon of gas by year end.Weekend:
How much does this boost growth? At first sight, not very much. After all, the US is becoming increasingly energy independent. The monthly energy trade deficit dropped to just $13.1bn in August. For argument’s sake, if we assume the trend since 2008 continues, the deficit will be zero by late 2018 ... Hence, the windfall of lower prices to consumers is almost matched by the loss to producers. Nonetheless, we would expect a net stimulus to growth in the near term. The big oil producers are flush with profits and cash. ... With such a large cushion of savings, we would expect them to respond slowly to weaker profit growth. Of course, if oil prices remain very low, over time, this will discourage investment and eventually lower the growth in oil production.
By contrast, consumers will likely respond quickly to the saving in energy costs. Many families live “hand to mouth”, spending whatever income is available. ... formal models suggest ... the $25/bbl drop in the price of oil can add roughly 0.4pp to real GDP growth over the next two years.
• Schedule for Week of October 19th
From CNBC: Pre-Market Data and Bloomberg futures: currently the S&P futures are up 10 and DOW futures are up about 100 (fair value).
Oil prices were down over the last week with WTI futures at $83.39 per barrel and Brent at $86.43 per barrel. A year ago, WTI was at $102, and Brent was at $109 - so prices are down close to 20% year-over-year.
Below is a graph from Gasbuddy.com for nationwide gasoline prices. Nationally prices are around $3.12 per gallon (down more than 20 cents from a year ago). If you click on "show crude oil prices", the graph displays oil prices for WTI, not Brent; gasoline prices in most of the U.S. are impacted more by Brent prices.
| Orange County Historical Gas Price Charts Provided by GasBuddy.com |
Hamilton: "How will Saudi Arabia respond to lower oil prices?"
by Calculated Risk on 10/19/2014 11:09:00 AM
Some interesting thoughts from Professor Hamilton: How will Saudi Arabia respond to lower oil prices?
Oil prices (along with prices of many other commodities) have fallen dramatically since last summer. Some observers are waiting to see if Saudi Arabia responds with significant cutbacks in production. I say, don’t hold your breath.
...
Last week I discussed the three main factors in the recent fall in oil prices: (1) signs of a return of Libyan production to historical levels, (2) surging production from the U.S., and (3) growing indications of weakness in the world economy.
As far as Libya is concerned, the politics on the ground remain quite unsettled. It makes sense to wait and see if anticipated production gains are really going to hold before anybody makes major adjustments.
In terms of surging U.S. production, the key question is how low the price can get before significant numbers of U.S. producers decide to pull out. If world economic growth indeed slows, and if most of the frackers are willing to keep going strong even if the price falls to $80 a barrel, trying to maintain the price at $90 could be a losing bet for the Saudis. They’d be giving up their own revenue just in order to keep the money flowing into ever-growing operations in Texas and North Dakota.
And if some of the U.S. producers do move into the red at current prices, it’s in the Saudis’ longer-term interests to let that pain take its toll until some of the newcomers decide to pack up and go home. If U.S. production does decline, prices would quickly move back up. But if that happens after a shake-out, the next time there would be less enthusiasm for everybody to jump into the game if they always have to keep an eye on whether they might be undercut again. This may be less of an issue for the U.S. tight oil producers, who can move in or out much more easily than operations like deepwater or artic, where there are huge fixed costs, long lead times, and a much bigger unavoidable loss if you gamble on prices always staying high.
And as for worries of another global economic downturn, so far they are only that– worries. If and when we see a downturn materialize, then I would expect to see the Saudis cut back production.
But until then it’s primarily a question of responding to surging output of U.S. tight oil. My guess is that Saudi Arabia would lower prices rather than cut production as long as that’s the name of the game.
emphasis added
Saturday, October 18, 2014
Schedule for Week of October 19th
by Calculated Risk on 10/18/2014 01:11:00 PM
The key reports this week are September New home sales on Friday, and Existing home sales on Tuesday.
For prices, CPI will be released on Wednesday.
No releases scheduled.
The consensus is for sales of 5.09 million on seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) basis. Sales in August were at a 5.05 million SAAR. Economist Tom Lawler estimates the NAR will report sales of 5.14 million SAAR.
A key will be the reported year-over-year increase in inventory of homes for sale.
10:00 AM: Regional and State Employment and Unemployment (Monthly) for September 2014
7:00 AM: The Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) will release the results for the mortgage purchase applications index.
8:30 AM: Consumer Price Index for September. The consensus is for no change in CPI in September and for core CPI to increase 0.1%.
During the day: The AIA's Architecture Billings Index for September (a leading indicator for commercial real estate).
8:30 AM: The initial weekly unemployment claims report will be released. The consensus is for claims to increase to 285 thousand from 264 thousand.
8:30 AM ET: Chicago Fed National Activity Index for September. This is a composite index of other data.
9:00 AM: FHFA House Price Index for August. This was originally a GSE only repeat sales, however there is also an expanded index. The consensus is for a 0.3% increase.
11:00 AM: the Kansas City Fed manufacturing survey for October.
This graph shows New Home Sales since 1963. The dashed line is the August sales rate.
The consensus is for a decrease in sales to 460 thousand Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate (SAAR) in September from 504 thousand in August.
Unofficial Problem Bank list declines to 426 Institutions
by Calculated Risk on 10/18/2014 08:15:00 AM
This is an unofficial list of Problem Banks compiled only from public sources.
Here is the unofficial problem bank list for Oct 17, 2014.
Changes and comments from surferdude808:
Unexpectedly, there was a bank failure today. Expectedly, the OCC provided us an update on their enforcement action activities through September. For the week, there were four removals and one addition that leave the Unofficial Problem Bank List at 426 institutions with assets of $135.5 billion. A year ago, the list held 677 institutions with assets of $236.8 billion.CR Note: The first unofficial problem bank list was published in August 2009 with 389 institutions. The list peaked at 1,002 institutions on June 10, 2011, and is now down to 426.
The OCC terminated actions against Heartland National Bank, Sebring, FL ($309 million); First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Kewanee, Kewanee, IL ($66 million); and American Loan and Savings Association, Hannibal, MO ($5 million). Also, the OCC issued a Formal Agreement against Homestead Savings Bank, Albion, MI ($72 million).
NBRS Financial, Rising Sun, MD ($191 million) became the 15th bank failure this year. At the 41st week of the year, the pace of 15 failures matches approximates the 16 failures at the 41st week of 2008. This is well under the 129 failures at the same point in 2010.
Since publication of the Unofficial Problem Bank List in August 2009, 384 banks on the list have been removed because of failure. This trails actual failures of 410 over the same period. Thus, there have been 26 banks that have failed without being under a published enforcement action.
We anticipate for the FDIC to provide an update on its enforcement action activities on the last Friday of the month on the 31st. So next week will likely see few changes to list.
Friday, October 17, 2014
Bank Failure Friday: NBRS Financial, Rising Sun, Maryland,15th Failure of 2014
by Calculated Risk on 10/17/2014 06:12:00 PM
This is the first bank failure since July!
From the FDIC: Howard Bank, Ellicott City, Maryland, Assumes All of the Deposits of NBRS Financial, Rising Sun, Maryland
As of June 30, 2014, NBRS Financial had approximately $188.2 million in total assets and $183.1 million in total deposits. ... The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $24.3 million. ... NBRS Financial is the 15th FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the second in Maryland. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was Slavie Federal Savings Bank, Bel Air, on May 30, 2014.
WSJ: "Fannie, Freddie Near Deal That Promises to Boost Mortgage Lending"
by Calculated Risk on 10/17/2014 01:01:00 PM
From Joe Light at the WSJ: Fannie, Freddie Near Deal That Promises to Boost Mortgage Lending
Mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac , their regulator and lenders are close to an agreement that could greatly expand mortgage credit while helping lenders protect themselves from charges of making bad loans, according to people familiar with the matter.CR Note: There are two parts: 1) less risk to lenders of being forced to buyback faulty loans, and 2) a lower downpayment in certain circumstances. According to the article the agreement could be announced next week.
...
The new agreement would clarify what mistakes should constitute fraud, giving greater confidence to lenders that they won’t be penalized many years after a loan is made.
...
Separately, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the FHFA are considering new programs that would allow them to guarantee some mortgages with down payments of as little as 3%.
A few comments on September Housing Starts
by Calculated Risk on 10/17/2014 11:45:00 AM
There were 761 thousand total housing starts during the first nine months of 2014 (not seasonally adjusted, NSA), up 9.5% from the 695 thousand during the same period of 2013. Single family starts are up 4%, and multifamily starts up 23%. The key weakness has been in single family starts.
The following table shows the annual housing starts since 2005, and the percent change from the previous year (estimates for 2014). The housing recovery has slowed in 2014, especially for single family starts. I expect to further growth in starts over the next several years.
| Housing Starts (000s) and Annual Change | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Total % Change | Single | Single % Change | |
| 2005 | 2,068.3 | 5.8% | 1,715.8 | 6.5% |
| 2006 | 1,800.9 | -12.9% | 1,465.4 | -14.6% |
| 2007 | 1,355.0 | -24.8% | 1,046.0 | -28.6% |
| 2008 | 905.5 | -33.2% | 622.0 | -40.5% |
| 2009 | 554.0 | -38.8% | 445.1 | -28.4% |
| 2010 | 586.9 | 5.9% | 471.2 | 5.9% |
| 2011 | 608.8 | 3.7% | 430.6 | -8.6% |
| 2012 | 780.6 | 28.2% | 535.3 | 24.3% |
| 2013 | 924.9 | 18.5% | 617.6 | 15.4% |
| 20141 | 990.0 | 7.0% | 630.0 | 2.0% |
| 1Estimate for 2014 | ||||
This graph shows the month to month comparison between 2013 (blue) and 2014 (red). Starts in 2014 have been above the same month in 2013 for six consecutive months.
Starts in Q1 2014 averaged 925 thousand SAAR, and starts in Q2 averaged 985 thousand SAAR, up 7% from Q1.
Starts in Q3 averaged 1.024 million SAAR, up 4% from Q2 (and up 16% from Q3 2013).
This year, I expect starts to mostly increase throughout the year (Q1 will probably be the weakest quarter, and Q2 the second weakest).
However the year-over-year growth will slow in Q4 because the comparisons will be more difficult.
Below is an update to the graph comparing multi-family starts and completions. Since it usually takes over a year on average to complete a multi-family project, there is a lag between multi-family starts and completions. Completions are important because that is new supply added to the market, and starts are important because that is future new supply (units under construction is also important for employment).
These graphs use a 12 month rolling total for NSA starts and completions.
The rolling 12 month total for starts (blue line) has been increasing steadily, and completions (red line) are lagging behind - but completions will continue to follow starts up (completions lag starts by about 12 months).
For the second consecutive month, there were more multifamily completions than multifamily starts.
Single family starts had been moving up, but recently starts have only increased slowly on a rolling 12 months basis.
Note the exceptionally low level of single family starts and completions. The "wide bottom" was what I was forecasting several years ago, and now I expect several years of increasing single family starts and completions.


