by Calculated Risk on 8/01/2013 08:30:00 AM
Thursday, August 01, 2013
Weekly Initial Unemployment Claims decline to 326,000
The DOL reports:
In the week ending July 27, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 326,000, a decrease of 19,000 from the previous week's revised figure of 345,000. The 4-week moving average was 341,250, a decrease of 4,500 from the previous week's revised average of 345,750.
The previous week was revised up from 343,000.
The following graph shows the 4-week moving average of weekly claims since January 2000.
Click on graph for larger image.The dashed line on the graph is the current 4-week average. The four-week average of weekly unemployment claims decreased to 341,250.
The 4-week average has mostly moved sideways over the last few months, and is near the low for the year. Claims were below to the 345,000 consensus forecast.
Wednesday, July 31, 2013
Thursday: Vehicle Sales, Unemployment Claims, ISM Mfg Index, Construction Spending
by Calculated Risk on 7/31/2013 08:29:00 PM
Restaurant spending is discretionary, so even though this is "D-list" data, I like to check it every month.
From the National Restaurant Association: Despite June Decline, Restaurant Performance Index Remains Steadily Positive
As a result of positive sales and traffic and an optimistic outlook among restaurant operators, the National Restaurant Association’s Restaurant Performance Index (RPI) remained in expansion territory in June. The RPI – a monthly composite index that tracks the health of and outlook for the U.S. restaurant industry – stood at 101.3 in June, down 0.5 percent from May’s level of 101.8. Despite the decline, June represented the fourth consecutive month that the RPI exceeded the 100 level, which signifies expansion in the index of key industry indicators.
“Although the overall RPI dipped somewhat in June, it remained in positive territory as restaurant operators continued to report gains in both sales and customer traffic,” said Hudson Riehle, senior vice president of the Research and Knowledge Group for the Association. “Looking forward, restaurant operators remain generally optimistic about the business environment in the months ahead, with the Expectations Index holding steady at a 12-month high.”
Click on graph for larger image.The index decreased to 101.3 in June from 101.8 in May. (above 100 indicates expansion).
Thursday:
• At 8:30 AM ET, the initial weekly unemployment claims report will be released. The consensus is for an increase to 345 thousand from 343 thousand last week.
• All day: Light vehicle sales for July. The consensus is for light vehicle sales to decrease to 15.8 million SAAR in July (Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate) from 15.9 million SAAR in June.
• At 9:00 AM, The Markit US PMI Manufacturing Index for July. The consensus is for the index to increase to 53.1 from 51.9 in June.
• At 10:00 AM, the ISM Manufacturing Index for July. The consensus is for an increase to 53.1 from 50.9 in June. Based on the regional surveys, an increase in July seems likely. The ISM manufacturing index indicated expansion in June at 50.9%. The employment index was at 48.7%, and the new orders index was at 51.9%.
• Also at 10:00 AM, Construction Spending for June. The consensus is for a 0.4% increase in construction spending.
Fannie Mae: Mortgage Serious Delinquency rate declined in June, Lowest since December 2008
by Calculated Risk on 7/31/2013 04:11:00 PM
Fannie Mae reported today that the Single-Family Serious Delinquency rate declined in June to 2.77% from 2.83% in May. The serious delinquency rate is down from 3.53% in June 2012, and this is the lowest level since December 2008.
The Fannie Mae serious delinquency rate peaked in February 2010 at 5.59%.
Earlier Freddie Mac reported that the Single-Family serious delinquency rate declined in June to 2.79% from 2.85% in May. Freddie's rate is down from 3.45% in June 2012, and is at the lowest level since May 2009. Freddie's serious delinquency rate peaked in February 2010 at 4.20%.
Note: These are mortgage loans that are "three monthly payments or more past due or in foreclosure".
Click on graph for larger image
Although this indicates progress, the "normal" serious delinquency rate is under 1%.
At the recent rate of improvement, the serious delinquency rate will not be under 1% until 2016 or so.
FOMC Statement: Downgrade from "moderate" to "modest"
by Calculated Risk on 7/31/2013 02:00:00 PM
Economic activity downgraded and more concern about inflation too low (update: added "too low).
FOMC Statement:
Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in June suggests that economic activity expanded at a modest pace during the first half of the year. Labor market conditions have shown further improvement in recent months, on balance, but the unemployment rate remains elevated. Household spending and business fixed investment advanced, and the housing sector has been strengthening, but mortgage rates have risen somewhat and fiscal policy is restraining economic growth. Partly reflecting transitory influences, inflation has been running below the Committee's longer-run objective, but longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable.
Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The Committee expects that, with appropriate policy accommodation, economic growth will pick up from its recent pace and the unemployment rate will gradually decline toward levels the Committee judges consistent with its dual mandate. The Committee sees the downside risks to the outlook for the economy and the labor market as having diminished since the fall. The Committee recognizes that inflation persistently below its 2 percent objective could pose risks to economic performance, but it anticipates that inflation will move back toward its objective over the medium term.
To support a stronger economic recovery and to help ensure that inflation, over time, is at the rate most consistent with its dual mandate, the Committee decided to continue purchasing additional agency mortgage-backed securities at a pace of $40 billion per month and longer-term Treasury securities at a pace of $45 billion per month. The Committee is maintaining its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities and of rolling over maturing Treasury securities at auction. Taken together, these actions should maintain downward pressure on longer-term interest rates, support mortgage markets, and help to make broader financial conditions more accommodative.
The Committee will closely monitor incoming information on economic and financial developments in coming months. The Committee will continue its purchases of Treasury and agency mortgage-backed securities, and employ its other policy tools as appropriate, until the outlook for the labor market has improved substantially in a context of price stability. The Committee is prepared to increase or reduce the pace of its purchases to maintain appropriate policy accommodation as the outlook for the labor market or inflation changes. In determining the size, pace, and composition of its asset purchases, the Committee will continue to take appropriate account of the likely efficacy and costs of such purchases as well as the extent of progress toward its economic objectives.
To support continued progress toward maximum employment and price stability, the Committee today reaffirmed its view that a highly accommodative stance of monetary policy will remain appropriate for a considerable time after the asset purchase program ends and the economic recovery strengthens. In particular, the Committee decided to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and currently anticipates that this exceptionally low range for the federal funds rate will be appropriate at least as long as the unemployment rate remains above 6-1/2 percent, inflation between one and two years ahead is projected to be no more than a half percentage point above the Committee's 2 percent longer-run goal, and longer-term inflation expectations continue to be well anchored. In determining how long to maintain a highly accommodative stance of monetary policy, the Committee will also consider other information, including additional measures of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and readings on financial developments. When the Committee decides to begin to remove policy accommodation, it will take a balanced approach consistent with its longer-run goals of maximum employment and inflation of 2 percent.
Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman; William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman; James Bullard; Elizabeth A. Duke; Charles L. Evans; Jerome H. Powell; Sarah Bloom Raskin; Eric S. Rosengren; Jeremy C. Stein; Daniel K. Tarullo; and Janet L. Yellen. Voting against the action was Esther L. George, who was concerned that the continued high level of monetary accommodation increased the risks of future economic and financial imbalances and, over time, could cause an increase in long-term inflation expectations.
emphasis added
Q2 GDP: More Weakness, Data below FOMC June Projections
by Calculated Risk on 7/31/2013 11:36:00 AM
Overall this was another weak GDP report although slightly above expectations.
It appears that the drag from state and local governments might be ending, although the drag from Federal government spending is ongoing.
Residential investment (RI) remains a bright spot (increasing at a 13.4% annualized rate), and RI as a percent of GDP is still very low - and I expect RI to continue to increase over the next few years.
For the FOMC meeting today, the data showed all indicators are still below the June projections (see bottom three graphs).
The first graph shows the contribution to percent change in GDP for residential investment and state and local governments since 2005.
Click on graph for larger image.
The blue bars are for residential investment (RI), and RI was a significant drag on GDP for several years. Now RI has added to GDP growth for the last 11 quarters (through Q2 2013).
And the drag from state and local governments may be ending.
At the least the drag has diminished, and based on recent news reports, I expect state and local governments to make small positive contributions to GDP going forward.
Residential Investment as a percent of GDP is up from the record lows during the housing bust. Usually RI bounces back quickly following a recession, but this time there is a wide bottom because of the excess supply of existing vacant housing units. Clearly RI has bottomed, but it still below the levels of previous recessions.
I'll break down Residential Investment (RI) into components after the GDP details are released this coming week. Note: Residential investment (RI) includes new single family structures, multifamily structures, home improvement, broker's commissions, and a few minor categories.
The third graph shows non-residential investment in structures, equipment and the new category "intellectual property products".
I'll add details for investment in offices, malls and hotels next week.
The key story is that residential investment is continuing to increase, and I expect this to continue. Since RI is the best leading indicator for the economy, this suggests no recession this year or in 2014 (with the usual caveats about Europe and policy errors in the US).
The following charts are relevant for the FOMC meeting today. At the June FOMC press conference, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke said:
"If the incoming data are broadly consistent with this forecast, the Committee currently anticipates that it would be appropriate to moderate the monthly pace of purchases later this year. And if the subsequent data remain broadly aligned with our current expectations for the economy, we would continue to reduce the pace of purchases in measured steps through the first half of next year, ending purchases around midyear. In this scenario, when asset purchases ultimately come to an end, the unemployment rate would likely be in the vicinity of 7%, with solid economic growth supporting further job gains, a substantial improvement from the 8.1% unemployment rate that prevailed when the committee announced this program."
This graph is for GDP.
The current forecast is for GDP to increase between 2.3% and 2.6% from Q4 2012 to Q4 2013.
The first and second quarters were below the FOMC projections (red), and GDP will have to pickup in the 2nd half of 2013 for the Fed to start tapering QE3 purchases in December.
GDP would have to increase at a 3.2% annual rate in the 2nd half to reach the FOMC lower projection, and at a 3.8% rate to reach the higher projection.
This graph is for PCE prices.The current forecast is for prices to increase 0.8% to 1.2% from Q4 2012 to Q4 2013.
So far PCE prices are below this projection - and this projection is significantly below the FOMC target of 2%. Clearly the FOMC expects inflation to pickup, and a key is if the recent decline in inflation is "transitory".
PCE prices would have to increase at a 1.8% annual rate in the 2nd half to reach the upper FOMC projection.
This graph is for core PCE prices.The current forecast is for core prices to increase 1.2% to 1.3% from Q4 2012 to Q4 2013.
So far core PCE prices are below this projection - and, once again, this projection is significantly below the FOMC target of 2%.
Real GDP increased 1.7% Annualized in Q2
by Calculated Risk on 7/31/2013 08:30:00 AM
Real gross domestic product -- the output of goods and services produced by labor and property located in the United States -- increased at an annual rate of 1.7 percent in the second quarter of 2013 (that is, from the first quarter to the second quarter), according to the "advance" estimate released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. In the first quarter, real GDP increased 1.1 percent (revised).Personal consumption expenditures (PCE) increased at a 1.8% annualized rate, and residential investment increased 13.4%. Equipment increased 4.1%, Intellectual property products 3.8%, and non-residential investment 4.6%.
The increase in real GDP in the second quarter primarily reflected positive contributions from personal consumption expenditures (PCE), exports, nonresidential fixed investment, private inventory investment, and residential investment that were partly offset by a negative contribution from federal government spending. Imports, which are a subtraction in the calculation of GDP, increased.
The acceleration in real GDP in the second quarter primarily reflected upturns in nonresidential fixed investment and in exports, a smaller decrease in federal government spending, and an upturn in state and local government spending that were partly offset by an acceleration in imports and decelerations in private inventory investment and in PCE.
"Change in private inventories" added 0.41 percentage points to GDP in Q2, and the Federal government subtracted 0.12 percentage points (mostly a decrease in non-defense spending). State and local governments turned slightly positive.
This was above expectations of a 1.1% growth rate. I'll have much more on GDP later including all the revisions ...
ADP: Private Employment increased 200,000 in July
by Calculated Risk on 7/31/2013 08:19:00 AM
Private-sector employment increased by 200,000 jobs from June to July, according to the June ADP National Employment Report®. ... June’s job gain was revised upward from 188,000 to 198,000.This was above the consensus forecast for 179,000 private sector jobs added in the ADP report. Note: The BLS reports on Friday, and the consensus is for an increase of 175,000 payroll jobs in July, on a seasonally adjusted (SA) basis.
...
Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody’s Analytics, said, "Job growth remains remarkably stable. Businesses are adding to payrolls in most industries and across all company sizes. The job market has admirably weathered the fiscal headwinds, tax increases and government spending cuts. This bodes well for the next year when those headwinds are set to fade.”
Note: ADP hasn't been very useful in predicting the BLS report.
MBA: Mortgage Applications decrease in Latest Weekly Survey
by Calculated Risk on 7/31/2013 07:01:00 AM
From the MBA: Mortgage Applications Decrease in Latest MBA Weekly Survey
Mortgage applications decreased 3.7 percent from one week earlier, according to data from the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey for the week ending July 26, 2013. ...
The Refinance Index decreased 4 percent from the previous week. The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index decreased 3 percent from one week earlier.
...
“Mortgage rates were little changed last week, but remain roughly one percentage point higher than they were three months ago,” said Mike Fratantoni, MBA’s Vice President of Research and Economics. “Refinance application volume continues to decline, with the refinance index now more than 55 percent lower than its recent peak, reaching the lowest level in over two years. Applications for home purchases dropped for the fourth time in five weeks, but purchase volume is running about 5 percent higher than last year at this time.”
...
The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages with conforming loan balances ($417,500 or less) was unchanged at 4.58 percent, with points decreasing to 0.38 from 0.40 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent loan-to-value ratio (LTV) loans.
emphasis added
Click on graph for larger image.The first graph shows the refinance index.
With 30 year mortgage rates up over the last 3 months, refinance activity has fallen sharply, decreasing in 11 of the last 12 weeks.
This index is down 57% over the last twelve weeks.
The second graph shows the MBA mortgage purchase index. The 4-week average of the purchase index has generally been trending up over the last year (but down over the last several weeks), and the 4-week average of the purchase index is up about 5% from a year ago.
Tuesday, July 30, 2013
Wednesday: GDP, FOMC Statement, ADP Employment and more
by Calculated Risk on 7/30/2013 09:06:00 PM
Here are two excellent articles. Really long term readers (back in 2005 and 2006) will remember my posts about contacting regulators about housing, and discussions of the Non-traditional Mortgage Guidance (when it was finally released). The first article mentions Janet Yellen's reaction to the guidance. Yellen had the same reaction as Tanta to the guidance (my former co-blogger). The second article discusses when Yellen was more hawkish than Greenspan in the '90s.
From Cardiff Garica at FT Alphaville: Already-strong case for Yellen strengthens further, and a word about the inanity of “market” preferences
Alan Blinder:And from Neil Irwin at the WaPo: Why we shouldn’t think of central bankers as hawks and doves
Fast forward to her days leading the San Francisco Fed, where she warned, as early as 2005, that the titanic real-estate market was heading for an iceberg. Ms. Yellen was frustrated that the Fed’s Board of Governors would not even issue regulatory guidance to curb disgraceful lending practices like piggyback loans that exceeded 100% of the house’s value, or loans with little or no documentation. When the board finally did so, she was dismayed at how weak the guidance was. She later told the Financial Crisis Inquiry Committee: “You could take it out and rip it up and throw it in the garbage can.” The guidance, she added, “wasn’t of any use” to the San Francisco Fed.
For example, Janet Yellen, the current Fed vice-chair, is viewed in markets as an uber-dove because she has been a strong advocate of the Fed’s unconventional monetary easing to try to help the job market. But it wasn’t always so. Larry Meyer served as a Fed governor with Yellen in the 1990s. In 1996, the two of them had concluded that the Fed needed to raise interest rates to fight the threat of inflation. They went to Alan Greenspan and told him of their concerns, threatening to dissent at a future meeting unless there was a rate increase. They lost the argument, but it is a sign that while Yellen may be a dove right now, the same would not be true in all states of the world.Wednesday:
• At 7:00 AM ET, the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) will release the results for the mortgage purchase applications index.
• At 8:15 AM, the ADP Employment Report for July. This report is for private payrolls only (no government). The consensus is for 179,000 payroll jobs added in July, down from 188,000 in June.
• At 8:30 AM, the BEA will release the advance estimate of Q2 GDP. The consensus is that real GDP increased 1.1% annualized in Q2. This report will includes a Comprehensive Revision from 1929 through 1st quarter 2013.
• At 9:45 AM, the Chicago Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) for July. The consensus is for an increase to 54.0, up from 51.6 in June.
• Ar 2:00 PM, the FOMC Meeting Announcement will be released. No change to interest rates or QE purchases is expected at this meeting.
Earlier on House Prices:
• Case-Shiller: Comp 20 House Prices increased 12.2% year-over-year in May
• Comment on House Prices: Real Prices, Price-to-Rent Ratio, Cities
Zillow: Case-Shiller House Price Index expected to show 12% year-over-year increase in June
by Calculated Risk on 7/30/2013 06:06:00 PM
The Case-Shiller house price indexes for May were released this morning. Zillow has started forecasting Case-Shiller a month early - and I like to check the Zillow forecasts since they have been pretty close. Note: Zillow makes a strong argument that the Case-Shiller index is currently overstating national house price appreciation.
Zillow Predicts Another 12% Annual Increase in Case-Shiller Indices for June
The Case-Shiller data for May came out this morning and, based on this information and the June 2013 Zillow Home Value Index (released last week), we predict that next month’s Case-Shiller data (June 2013) will show that the 20-City Composite Home Price Index (non-seasonally adjusted [NSA]) increased 12.1 percent on a year-over-year basis, while the 10-City Composite Home Price Index (NSA) increased 12 percent on a year-over-year basis. The seasonally adjusted (SA) month-over-month change from May to June will be 1.1 percent for the 20-City Composite and 1.2 percent for the 10-City Composite Home Price Indices (SA). All forecasts are shown in the table below. Officially, the Case-Shiller Composite Home Price Indices for June will not be released until Tuesday, Aug. 27.The following table shows the Zillow forecast for the June Case-Shiller index.
...
The Case-Shiller indices are giving an inflated sense of national home value appreciation because they are biased toward the large, coastal metros currently seeing such enormous home value gains, and because they include foreclosure resales. The inclusion of foreclosure resales disproportionately boosts the index when these properties sell again for much higher prices — not just because of market improvements, but also because the sales are no longer distressed. We are seeing this issue especially in regions where home graphvalues fell drastically, producing a large number of foreclosures, which are now selling as normal sales after REOs (foreclosure resales) amidst extremely high home value appreciation. These areas include parts of California, Phoenix and Las Vegas. In contrast, the ZHVI does not include foreclosure resales and shows home values for June 2013 up 5.8 percent from year-ago levels. We expect home value appreciation to continue to moderate a bit in 2013, rising 5 percent between June 2013 and June 2014. Further details on our forecast of home values can be found here, and more on Zillow’s full June 2013 report can be found here.
...
To forecast the Case-Shiller indices, we use the May Case-Shiller index level, as well as the June Zillow Home Value Index (ZHVI), which is available more than a month in advance of the Case-Shiller index, paired with June foreclosure resale numbers, which Zillow also publishes more than a month prior to the release of the Case-Shiller index. Together, these data points enable us to reliably forecast the Case-Shiller 10-City and 20-City Composite indices.
| Zillow June Forecast for Case-Shiller Index | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case Shiller Composite 10 | Case Shiller Composite 20 | ||||
| NSA | SA | NSA | SA | ||
| Case Shiller (year ago) | June 2012 | 154.94 | 154.07 | 142.37 | 141.37 |
| Case-Shiller (last month) | May 2013 | 169.69 | 170.62 | 156.14 | 157.01 |
| Zillow Forecast | YoY | 12.0% | 12.0% | 12.1% | 12.1% |
| MoM | 2.2% | 1.2% | 2.3% | 1.1% | |
| Zillow Forecasts1 | 173.5 | 172.6 | 159.7 | 158.6 | |
| Current Post Bubble Low | 146.46 | 149.61 | 134.07 | 136.85 | |
| Date of Post Bubble Low | Mar-12 | Jan-12 | Mar-12 | Jan-12 | |
| Above Post Bubble Low | 18.4% | 15.4% | 19.1% | 15.9% | |
| 1Estimate based on Year-over-year and Month-over-month Zillow forecasts | |||||


