by Calculated Risk on 3/15/2013 05:47:00 PM

From economist Tom Lawler:

Based on reports I’ve seen so far from various state and local realtor association/board/MLS reports (and a few reports based on property records), it seems highly likely that the YOY growth rate in unadjusted existing home sales as measured by the National Association of Realtors slowed substantially in February relative to January’s reported YOY sales gain of 11.9%. Almost all areas reporting so far showed slower YOY growth in February relative to January, and several states/areas showed YOY declines (including but not limited to California, Michigan, Iowa, Minnesota, Long Island, Phoenix, Tucson, Las Vegas, and Reno). Based on what I’ve seen so far, I estimate that February existing home sales as measured by the NAR will show a YOY increase of about 4.3%. Of course, the YOY gain in seasonally adjusted sales will be higher, reflecting the lower business day count this February vs. last February (last year was a leap year). Based on my estimated seasonal factor, I expect that the NAR will report that existing home sales in February ran at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of about 4.87 million, down about 1% from January’s pace, and up about 7.7% from last February’s pace.

On the inventory front, it’s a bit challenging of late to estimate the NAR’s existing home inventory, as it hasn’t been “tracking” various trackers of overall home listings. E.g., realtor.com said that daily residential listings on realtor.com during January averaged 1,477,266, down 16.5% from last January’s average, and during February listings averaged 1,494,218, down 16.0% from last February (December showed a YOY decline of 17.3%). Zillow said that residential listings on Zillow.com on January 23, 2013 were 17.5% lower than listings on January 23, 2012, and listings on February 24, 2013 were down 16.6% from February 24, 2012. The NAR, however, estimated that the number of existing homes for sale at the end of January was 25.3% lower than the number of existing homes for sale a year earlier! And the monthly drop in the NAR’s inventory estimate for January of 4.9% substantially exceeded that of all listings trackers, as well as what local realtor/MLS reports would have suggested.

Based on listings trackers as well as the local realtor/MLS reports I’ve seen so far, I’d expect that “actual” existing home inventories increased by a modest 1% or so in February. How that will translate in the NAR’s estimate, however, is not clear: a 1% increase in the NAR’s estimate in February, combined with no revision in the January estimate, would imply an implausibly large YOY drop of 26.7%. In looking at admittedly limited historical data, however, there has been a tendency for the NAR inventory number in February to show a bigger gain than other measure, so I’m “guessing” that the NAR inventory estimate will show a monthly gain of 3% or so.

CR Note: The NAR will report February existing home sales on Thursday, March 21st. The early consensus is the NAR will report sales of 4.99 million on a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) basis.  However Lawler's analysis suggests the NAR will report sales of around 4.87 million SAAR.

Based on Lawler's estimates, the NAR will report inventory at around 1.8 million units for February, and months-of-supply around 4.4 months (up from 4.2 months in January, but still very low).   

by Calculated Risk on 3/15/2013 03:59:00 PM

From Fannie Mae: Fannie Mae Files Form 12b-25 Requesting Extension to File 2012 Q4 and Full-Year Financial Results

Fannie Mae (formally, the Federal National Mortgage Association) has determined that it is unable to file its Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2012 by the March 18, 2013 filing deadline due to the need for additional time to analyze whether conditions existed as of December 31, 2012 that would require Fannie Mae, under generally accepted accounting principles, to release any portion of the valuation allowance on its deferred tax assets in the fourth quarter of 2012. The release of the valuation allowance would have a material impact on the company’s 2012 financial statements and result in a significant dividend payment to the U.S. Department of the Treasury under the terms of the Variable Liquidation Preference Senior Preferred Stock, Series 2008-2.

If we conclude the valuation allowance should not be released in the fourth quarter of 2012, we will continue to evaluate the need for the valuation allowance in future periods. The valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets was $64.1 billion as of December 31, 2011 and $61.5 billion as of September 30, 2012.

Regardless of the decision to release or not release the valuation allowance, we expect to report significant net income for the three months and the year ended December 31, 2012, compared with a net loss of $2.4 billion for the three months ended December 31, 2011 and a net loss of $16.9 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011.
emphasis added

Economist Tom Lawler explains:
"Given negative earnings and prospects for negative earnings, in 2008 Fannie felt that ... a large portion of its deferred tax asset would never be realized, and as a result it created a "valuation allowance" for its net deferred asset, which hit earnings and net worth. As of 9/30/12, that valuation allowance was $61.5 billion."

CR Note: From Fannie's 2008 Annual SEC filing:

We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences related to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, and for tax credits. In the third quarter of 2008, we recorded a non-cash charge of $21.4 billion to establish a partial deferred tax asset valuation allowance. In the fourth quarter of 2008, we recorded an additional deferred tax asset valuation allowance of $9.4 billion, which represented the reserve for the tax benefit associated with the pre-tax loss we incurred in the fourth quarter of 2008. The additional $9.4 billion valuation allowance increased our total deferred tax asset valuation allowance to $30.8 billion as of December 31, 2008, resulting in a reduction in our net deferred tax assets to $3.9 billion as of December 31, 2008, compared with $13.0 billion as of December 31, 2007.

We evaluate our deferred tax assets for recoverability using a consistent approach that considers the relative impact of negative and positive evidence, including our historical profitability and projections of future taxable income. We are required to establish a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets and record a charge to income or stockholders’ equity if we determine, based on available evidence at the time the determination is made, that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

From Lawler:
"With current earnings strong and with the projections for earnings having been upped a boatload, Fannie now is trying to figure out if it can "release" a big chunk of that valuation allowance, and apparently there are some issues about how to figure this out. If they did release a lot, net worth would jump sharply -- but, of course, be swept to the Treasury!"

by Calculated Risk on 3/15/2013 12:34:00 PM

The Cleveland Fed released the median CPI and the trimmed-mean CPI this morning:

According to the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, the median Consumer Price Index rose 0.2% (2.9% annualized rate) in February. The 16% trimmed-mean Consumer Price Index rose 0.2% (2.6% annualized rate) during the month. The median CPI and 16% trimmed-mean CPI are measures of core inflation calculated by the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland based on data released in the Bureau of Labor Statistics' (BLS) monthly CPI report.

Earlier today, the BLS reported that the seasonally adjusted CPI for all urban consumers rose 0.7% (8.5% annualized rate) in February. The CPI less food and energy increased 0.2% (2.1% annualized rate) on a seasonally adjusted basis.

Note: The Cleveland Fed has the median CPI details for February here. Motor fuel increased at a 180% annualized rate in February! That was a sharp increase, but prices have fallen a little in March.

Click on graph for larger image.

This graph shows the year-over-year change for these four key measures of inflation. On a year-over-year basis, the median CPI rose 2.2%, the trimmed-mean CPI rose 1.9%, and the CPI less food and energy rose 2.0%. Core PCE is for January and increased 1.3% year-over-year.

On a monthly basis, median CPI was at 2.9% annualized, trimmed-mean CPI was at 2.6% annualized, and core CPI increased 2.1% annualized. Also core PCE for January increased 1.8% annualized.

The Fed has been clear that their 2% inflation target is not a ceiling, and that they will tolerate some short term increases in inflation as long as the unemployment rate remains elevated and inflation expectations remain "well anchored".  From the recent FOMC statement: "the Committee ... currently anticipates that this exceptionally low range for the federal funds rate will be appropriate at least as long as the unemployment rate remains above 6-1/2 percent, inflation between one and two years ahead is projected to be no more than a half percentage point above the Committee’s 2 percent longer-run goal, and longer-term inflation expectations continue to be well anchored".

The Fed will meet next week, and with this level of inflation and the current high level of unemployment, I expect the Fed will keep the "pedal to the metal".

by Calculated Risk on 3/15/2013 09:55:00 AM

Click on graph for larger image.

The preliminary Reuters / University of Michigan consumer sentiment index for March declined to 71.8 from the February reading of 77.6.

This was well below the consensus forecast of 77.7, and very low. There are a number of factors that impact sentiment including unemployment, gasoline prices and, for 2013, the payroll tax increase and even politics (sequestration, default threats, etc).  

In this case, the decline was probably related to both high gasoline prices and policy concerns. According to Reuters, a record 34 percent of those surveyed were negative about government economic policies (sequestration, etc.). Reuters also reports that buying plans were essentially unchanged.

by Calculated Risk on 3/15/2013 09:36:00 AM

From the Fed: Industrial production and Capacity Utilization

Industrial production increased 0.7 percent in February after having been unchanged in January. Manufacturing output rose 0.8 percent in February, and the index revised up for the previous two months. In February, the output of utilities advanced 1.6 percent, as temperatures for the month were near their seasonal norms after two months of unseasonably warm weather. The production at mines declined 0.3 percent, its third consecutive monthly decrease. At 99.5 percent of its 2007 average, total industrial production in February was 2.5 percent above its level of a year earlier. The capacity utilization rate for total industry increased to 79.6 percent, a rate that is 0.6 percentage point below its long-run (1972--2012) average.
emphasis added

Click on graph for larger image.

This graph shows Capacity Utilization. This series is up 12.8 percentage points from the record low set in June 2009 (the series starts in 1967).

Capacity utilization at 79.6% is still 0.6 percentage points below its average from 1972 to 2010 and below the pre-recession level of 80.6% in December 2007.

Note: y-axis doesn't start at zero to better show the change.

The second graph shows industrial production since 1967.

Industrial production increased in February to 99.5. This is 19.2% above the recession low, but still 1.2% below the pre-recession peak.

The monthly change for both Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization were above expectations.

by Calculated Risk on 3/15/2013 08:30:00 AM

• From the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS): Consumer Price Index - February 2013

The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) increased 0.7 percent in February on a seasonally adjusted basis, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Over the last 12 months, the all items index increased 2.0 percent before seasonal adjustment. The gasoline index rose 9.1 percent in February to account for almost three-fourths of the seasonally adjusted all items increase.
...
The index for all items less food and energy increased 0.2 percent in February.

On a year-over-year basis, CPI is up 2.0 percent, and core CPI is up also up 2.0 percent.  Both are at the Fed's target. This was above the consensus forecast of a 0.5% increase for CPI (due to gasoline prices), and a 0.2% increase in core CPI.

I'll post a graph later today after the Cleveland Fed releases the median and trimmed-mean CPI.

• From the NY Fed: Empire State Manufacturing Survey

The general business conditions index was positive for a second consecutive month and, at 9.2, was little changed. ... Employment indexes suggested that labor market conditions were sluggish, with little change in employment levels and the length of the average workweek. Indexes for the six-month outlook pointed to an increasing level of optimism about future conditions, with the future general business conditions index rising to its highest level in nearly a year.

This is the first of the regional manufacturing surveys for March. This was at the consensus forecast of a reading of 8.5.

by Calculated Risk on 3/14/2013 07:57:00 PM

First, here is a price index for commercial real estate that I follow. CoStar reported that their value weighted index is up 4.8% year-over-year, and the equal weighted index is up 5.5% from January 2012. Also the volume of distressed sales is continuing to decline.

From CoStar: Commercial Real Estate Pricing Levels Off In January Following Year-End Surge

The U.S. Value-Weighted Composite Index, which weights each repeat-sale by transaction size or value (and therefore is heavily influenced by larger transactions), ticked up by 0.7% in January, and has now increased 38% from its trough in 2010. The U.S. Equal-Weighted Composite Index, which weights each repeat-sale by transaction equally (and therefore is heavily influenced by numerous smaller transactions), began 2013 with a 2.9% monthly loss, largely due to a seasonal slowdown in trading activities after the year-end sales surge. However, thanks to its steady recovery throughout 2012, the equal-weighted index has increased 5.5% since January 2012.
...
Distressed sales as a percentage of total transactions have been following a declining trend since the start of 2011. Although this percentage ticked up in January 2013 due to the seasonal slowdown in total transactions, the number of repeat sales involving distress assets was the lowest in January 2013 since the summer of 2009.
emphasis added

Click on graph for larger image.

This graph from CoStar shows the Value-Weighted and Equal-Weighted indexes. As CoStar noted, the Value-Weighted index is up 38.5% from the bottom (showing the demand for higher end properties) and up 4.8% year-over-year. However the Equal-Weighted index is only up 9.0% from the bottom, and up 5.5% year-over-year.

Note: These are repeat sales indexes - like Case-Shiller for residential - but this is based on far fewer pairs.

Friday economic releases:
• At 8:30 AM ET, the Consumer Price Index for February will be released. The consensus is for a 0.5% increase in CPI in February (due to higher gasoline prices) and for core CPI to increase 0.2%.

• Also at 8:30 AM, the NY Fed Empire Manufacturing Survey for March. The consensus is for a reading of 8.5, down from 10.0 in February (above zero is expansion).

• At 9:15 AM, the Fed will release Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization for February. The consensus is for a 0.3% increase in Industrial Production in February, and for Capacity Utilization to increase to 79.3%.

• At 9:55 AM, the preliminary March Reuter's/University of Michigan's Consumer sentiment index will be released. The consensus is for a reading of 77.5, down from 77.6.

by Calculated Risk on 3/14/2013 04:15:00 PM

From Freddie Mac today: Mortgage Rates up on Signs of Improving Economy

The 30-year fixed averaged 3.63 percent, its highest reading since the week of August 23, 2012. The 30-year fixed hit its average all-time record low of 3.31 percent the week of November 21, 2012. ...

30-year fixed-rate mortgage (FRM) averaged 3.63 percent with an average 0.8 point for the week ending March 14, 2013, up from last week when it averaged 3.52 percent. Last year at this time, the 30-year FRM averaged 3.92 percent.

15-year FRM this week averaged 2.79 percent with an average 0.8 point, up from last week when it averaged 2.76 percent. A year ago at this time, the 15-year FRM averaged 3.16 percent.

Click on graph for larger image.

This graph shows the MBA's refinance index (monthly average) and the the 30 year fixed rate mortgage interest rate from the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey®.

The Freddie Mac survey started in 1971 and mortgage rates are currently near the record low for the last 40 years.

This shows the recent small increase in mortgage rates.  This probably means refinance activity will slow in 2013.  Note: There has been an increase in refinance activity due to HARP.

Here is an update to an old graph - by request - that shows the relationship between the 10 year Treasury Yield and 30 year mortgage rates. 

Currently the 10 year Treasury yield is 2.02% and 30 year mortgage rates are at 3.63%.  If the ten year yield stay in this range, 30 year mortgage rates might move up a little from here.


The third graph shows the 15 and 30 year fixed rates from the Freddie Mac survey since the Primary Mortgage Market Survey® started in 1971 (15 year in 1991).

The recent increase in rates is pretty small on this long term graph.

Note: Mortgage rates were at or below 5% back in the 1950s.

by Calculated Risk on 3/14/2013 01:54:00 PM

From Realtor.com: Spring Home Buying Season Starts Early According to realtor.com®'s February Trend Data

In February, the total number of single-family homes, condos, townhomes and co-ops for sale in the U.S. (1,494,218) increased by 1.15 percent month-over-month. On an annual basis, however, inventory was down by 15.97 percent.

The median age of inventory of for sale listings fell to 98 days in February, down 9.26 percent from January and 11.71 percent below the median age one year ago (February 2012).

Nearly all of the markets with the largest year-over-year declines in their for sale inventories in February were in California, where declines averaged 48 percent. The list includes Sacramento, Stockton, Oakland, San Jose, Orange County, Los Angeles, Seattle, San Francisco, Riverside and Ventura. These markets also experienced a dramatic decline in the median age of inventory, falling to an average of just 31 days, or 53 percent lower than it was one year ago.

Note: Realtor.com reports the average number of listings in a month, whereas the NAR uses an end-of-month estimate. Since inventory usually starts to come back on the market early in the year, the NAR will probably report a larger month-to-month increase in inventory for February than Realtor.com.

Inventory decreased year-over-year in 141 of the 146 markets realtor.com tracks, and by more than 20% year-over-year in 43 markets.

The NAR is scheduled to report February existing home sales and inventory on Thursday, March 21st.

by Calculated Risk on 3/14/2013 10:35:00 AM

In addition to Case-Shiller, CoreLogic, FHFA and LPS, I'm also watching the FNC, Zillow and several other house price indexes.

From FNC: FNC Index: January Home Prices Rise 0.3%

The latest FNC Residential Price Index® (RPI) indicates that U.S. property values continued to recover through January—the 11th consecutive month of rising prices. Despite the uneven pace of price gains across different geographical markets, there are clear signs that the housing recovery is increasingly widespread.

A limited housing supply and declining foreclosure sales are contributing to the recovery of underlying property values. The average list-to-sale price ratio increased to 93.5 in January, compared to 90.3 during the same period a year ago; in other words, the average asking price discount dropped to 6.5% from 9.7%. Foreclosures, as a percentage of total home sales, were 20.2% in January, down from 26.9% a year ago.

Based on recorded sales of non-distressed properties (existing and new homes) in the 100 largest metropolitan areas, the FNC 100-MSA composite index shows that January home prices rose 0.3% from the previous month and were up 5.7% on a year-over-year basis from the same period in 2012. The 30-MSA and 10-MSA composite indices show similar trends of rising prices, with the 10-MSA composite accelerating more rapidly at 0.8% month-over-month and 7.2% year-over-year.
...
Although home prices have improved significantly in the last 12 months, a six-year price comparison shows that current prices remain well below their near-peak levels. On average, today’s home prices are about 27.5% below January 2007. In hard-hit markets such as Las Vegas, Orlando, Miami, and Riverside, Calif., home prices are only half of what they were six years ago.

The year-over-year change continued to increase in January, with the 100-MSA composite up 5.7% compared to January 2012. The FNC index turned positive on a year-over-year basis in July, 2012.

Click on graph for larger image.

This graph shows the year-over-year change for the FNC Composite 10, 20, 30 and 100 indexes. Note: The FNC indexes are hedonic price indexes using a blend of sold homes and real-time appraisals.

The key is the indexes are now showing a year-over-year increase indicating prices probably bottomed early in 2012.