by Calculated Risk on 10/23/2010 09:05:00 PM

The first scene is a classic with all the election signs! Jim says: "Tough time of year for open houses. Aren't you suffering from sign overload right about now?" Yeah, I am!

Jim also update us on some foreclosures and shows us an "estate" in Encinitas (in a mixed neighborhood), and Jim rocks out at the end.

I know the "estate" area very well - that was all flower growers not that many years ago. Some of the land has been sold off to builders, and it looks like some guy bought one plot and built an "estate". Here is the google map of the house (it goes about 70% of the way from Lake to Crest). A little out of character for the immediate neighborhood, and notice all the growers around it.

by Calculated Risk on 10/23/2010 05:28:00 PM

I haven't updated these graphs for some time ...

There have been 307 bank failures in this cycle (starting in 2007):

FDIC Bank Failures by Year
2007	3
2008	25
2009	140
2010	139
Total	307

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows bank failures by week in 2008, 2009 and 2010.

At this time last year, there were 106 bank failures - on the way to 140 total failures in 2009. This year there are 139 failures so far, and, at this pace, it looks like there will be around 175 total failures in 2010.

That would be the highest total since the 181 bank failures in 1992.

Bank failures peaked at 534 in 1989 during the S&L crisis.

And on total assets from the December Congressional Oversight Panel’s Troubled Asset Relief Program report:

[A]lthough the number of failed banks was significantly higher in the late 1980s than it is now, the aggregate assets of failed banks during the current crisis far outweighs those from the 1980s. At the high point in 1988 and 1989, 763 banks failed, with total assets of $309 billion. Compare this to 149 banks failing in 2008 and 2009, with total assets of $473 billion.

Note: This is in 2005 dollars and doesn't include the failures in 2010 (only estimates are available so far for 2010). However this does include the failure of WaMu in 2008 with $307 billion in assets that didn't impact the DIF.

by Calculated Risk on 10/23/2010 01:52:00 PM

Some interesting data for just one small area ...

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

Graph from North County Times and shows the impact of the BofA foreclosure moratorium on repossessions in a non-judicial area.

This is just in the North San Diego and Southwest Riverside counties.

From Eric Wolff at the NC Times: Foreclosure moratorium takes hold locally

In the first week of the moratorium, starting Oct. 12, the number of houses foreclosed in the region plummeted 27 percent from the previous week, to 173 foreclosure sales, according to ForeclosureRadar.

Much of the drop can be attributed to Bank of America's subsidiary ReconTrust NA, which handled 23.7 percent of the region's foreclosures in 2010.

The "foreclosure-gate" scandal had no impact on existing home sales in September (to be released this coming Monday), but will probably have an impact on closed sales in October.

by Calculated Risk on 10/23/2010 08:39:00 AM

Note: this is an unofficial list of Problem Banks compiled only from public sources.

Here is the unofficial problem bank list for Oct 22, 2010.

Changes and comments from surferdude808:

Failures contributed to the Unofficial Problem Bank List changes this week. There were eight removals, with seven because of failure, and four additions, which leaves the list at 871 institutions with assets of $402.2 billion.

Among the removals was the unassisted merger of Citizens National Bank of Springfield ($254 million) into cross-town Empire Bank, Springfield, MO. The failures included Hillcrest Bank ($1.6 billion); First Arizona Savings, a FSB ($272 million); First Suburban National Bank ($149 million); The First National Bank of Barnesville ($136 million); Progress Bank of Florida ($111 million); First Bank of Jacksonville ($81 million); and The Gordon Bank ($29 million).

The First National Bank of Barnesville opened its doors in 1902; thus, it survived the Great Depression but it was not able to weather the Great Recession.

The FDIC could not find a buyer for First Arizona Savings so they will mail insured depositors a check; however, its cost estimate of only 12 percent of assets is the lowest of the night and one-third lower than the next cheapest deposit payoff in this cycle, which was Arcola Homestead Savings Bank at 18.8 percent in June 2010.

The four additions are Gibraltar Private Bank & Trust Co., Coral Gables, FL ($1.6 billion); Wilber National Bank, Oneonta, NY ($929 million Ticker: GIW); Highlands Union Bank, Abingdon, VA ($649 million Ticker: HBKA); and Bank of Maumee, Maumee, OH ($45 million). Gibraltar had purchased about $1.5 billion of assets from Boston Private Bank & Trust Company (Ticker: BPFH) in 2009.

Next week there should be many changes as we expect the FDIC to release its actions for September 2010.

by Calculated Risk on 10/22/2010 09:21:00 PM

New oxymoron
First / Arizona / Savings
No / yes / not at all
by Soylent Green is People
From the FDIC: FDIC Approves the Payout of the Insured Deposits of First Arizona Savings, A FSB, Scottsdale, Arizona

As of June 30, 2010, First Arizona Savings, A FSB had approximately $272.2 million in total assets and $198.8 million in total deposits. ... The FDIC estimates the cost of the failure to its Deposit Insurance Fund to be approximately $32.8 million. ... The last institution closed in the state was Towne Bank of Arizona, Mesa, on May 7, 2010.

No one wanted this one! That makes 7 today ...

by Calculated Risk on 10/22/2010 07:11:00 PM

Great gaping gullet
Federal feeding frenzy
Huge heartland heartburn
by Soylent Green is People
From the FDIC: Seaway Bank and Trust Company, Chicago, Illinois, Assumes All of the Deposits of First Suburban National Bank, Maywood, Illinois

As of June 30, 2010, First Suburban National Bank had approximately $148.7 million in total assets and $140.0 million in total deposits ... The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $31.4 million. .... First Suburban National Bank is the 137th FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the 16th in Illinois.

From the FDIC: Hillcrest Bank, National Association, Overland Park, Kansas, Assumes All of the Deposits of Hillcrest Bank, Overland Park, Kansas

As of June 30, 2010, Hillcrest Bank had approximately $1.65 billion in total assets and $1.54 billion in total deposits. ... The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $329.7 million. ... Hillcrest Bank is the 138th FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the third in Kansas.

by Calculated Risk on 10/22/2010 06:27:00 PM

Swing stable door shut
Far too late for Barnsville now
Money's ridden off
by Soylent Green is People
From the FDIC: United Bank, Zebulon, Georgia, Assumes All of the Deposits of The First National Bank of Barnesville, Barnesville, Georgia

As of June 30, 2010, The First National Bank of Barnesville had approximately $131.4 million in total assets and $127.1 million in total deposits. ... The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $33.9 million. ... The First National Bank of Barnesville is the 136th FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the 16th in Georgia.

Four down ...

by Calculated Risk on 10/22/2010 05:09:00 PM

Bright pyrite nuggets
Florida, Georgia failures
A phantom luster
by Soylent Green is People
From the FDIC: Ameris Bank, Moultrie, Georgia, Assumes All of the Deposits of First Bank of Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida

As of June 30, 2010, First Bank of Jacksonville had approximately $81.0 million in total assets and $77.3 million in total deposits. ... The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $16.2 million. ... First Bank of Jacksonville is the 133rd FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the 26th in Florida.

From the FDIC: Bay Cities Bank, Tampa, Florida, Assumes All of the Deposits of Progress Bank of Florida, Tampa, Florida

As of June 30, 2010, Progress Bank of Florida had approximately $110.7 million in total assets and $101.3 million in total deposits. ... The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $25.0 million. ... Progress Bank of Florida is the 134th FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the 27th in Florida.

From the FDIC: Morris Bank, Dublin, Georgia, Assumes All of the Deposits of The Gordon Bank, Gordon, Georgia

As of June 30, 2010, The Gordon Bank had approximately $29.4 million in total assets and $26.7 million in total deposits. ... The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $9.0 million. ... The Gordon Bank is the 135th FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the 15th in Georgia.

by Calculated Risk on 10/22/2010 04:07:00 PM

From the National Employment Law Project: 1.2 Million Workers Out in the Cold for the Holidays If Congress Fails to Renew Federal Jobless Benefits that Expire November 30th

A new analysis released by the National Employment Law Project today reveals that 1.2 million workers will be cut off of federal jobless benefits by year’s end if Congress fails to renew the federal emergency extensions that expire on November 30th.
...
Of the 1.2 million workers at risk of losing federal benefits, 387,000 are workers who were recently laid-off and are now receiving the six months (26 weeks) of regular state benefits. After exhausting state benefits, these workers would be left to fend for themselves in a job market with just one job opening for every five unemployed workers and an unemployment rate that has exceeded nine percent for 17 months in a row—with no federal unemployment assistance whatsoever.

This doesn't include the '99ers - the workers who have exhausted all available unemployment benefits.

by Calculated Risk on 10/22/2010 12:58:00 PM

I usually focus on Case-Shiller and Corelogic repeat sales house price indexes. Case-Shiller is the mostly widely followed, and the Federal Reserve uses Corelogic.

The Clear Capital index is also repeat sales, with a price-per-square-foot model, and is a rolling three months average that can be updated daily. I thought I'd pass along this alert today:

Clear Capital™ Reports Sudden and Dramatic Drop in U.S. Home Prices

“Clear Capital’s latest data through October 22 shows even more pronounced price declines than our most recent HDI market report released two weeks ago,” said Dr. Alex Villacorta, senior statistician, Clear Capital. “At the national level, home prices are clearly experiencing a dramatic drop from the tax credit-induced highs, effectively wiping out all of the gains obtained during the flurry of activity just preceding the tax credit expiration.”

This special Clear Capital Home Data Index (HDI) alert shows that national home prices have declined 5.9% in just two months and are now at the same level as in mid April 2010, two weeks prior to the expiration of the recent federal homebuyer tax credit. This significant drop in prices, in advance of the typical winter housing market slowdowns, paints an ominous picture that will likely show up in other home data indices in the coming months.

... if previous correlations between the Clear Capital and S&P/Case-Shiller indices continue as expected, the next two months will show a similar downward trend in S&P/Case Shiller numbers.

The most recent Case-Shiller numbers were for July (actually a three month average of May, June and July). The August numbers will be released next Tuesday (an average of June, July and August) - so there is a significant lag in the numbers.