by Calculated Risk on 10/21/2010 02:17:00 PM

Hotel occupancy is one of several industry specific indicators I follow ...

Important: Even though the occupancy rate is close to 2008 levels, 2010 is a much more difficult year for the hotel industry than 2008. RevPAR (revenue per available room) is up 9.4% compared to 2009, but still down 7.8% compared to 2008 - and 2008 was a very difficult year for the hotel industry.

From HotelNewsNow.com: STR: Economy ADR performance falls short

Overall occupancy increased 8.3% to 63.8%, ADR was up 0.9% to US$100.40, and RevPAR ended the week up 9.4% to US$64.09.

The following graph shows the four week moving average for the occupancy rate by week for 2008, 2009 and 2010 (and a median for 2000 through 2007).

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

Notes: the scale doesn't start at zero to better show the change. The graph shows the 4-week average, not the weekly occupancy rate.

On a 4-week basis, occupancy is up 7.9% compared to last year (the worst year since the Great Depression) and 6.1% below the median for 2000 through 2007.

The occupancy rate is about at the levels of 2008, but RevPAR is still down 7.8%.

Data Source: Smith Travel Research, Courtesy of HotelNewsNow.com

by Calculated Risk on 10/21/2010 11:35:00 AM

From the FHFA: FHFA Releases Projections Showing Range of Potential Draws for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

To date, the Enterprises have drawn $148 billion from the Treasury Department under the terms of the [Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements] PSPAs. Under the three scenarios used in the projections, cumulative Enterprise draws range from $221 billion to $363 billion through 2013.

The key to the size of future draws is the trajectory of house prices. The following graph shows the three house projections used by the FHFA:

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

From the FHFA:

Stronger Near-term Recovery (FHFA Scenario 1) “Increased access to credit supports the above baseline growth. As a result, the recent increases in house prices are sustained, although additional increases are minimal in 2010 and 2011.” The peak to-trough decline is 31%. From the trough in 1Q09 to the end of the forecast period house prices increase by 5%.

Current Baseline (FHFA Scenario 2) "Small remaining home price declines" contribute to a 34% peak-to-trough decline. From the trough in 3Q11 to the end of the forecast period house prices increase by 8%.

Deeper Second Recession (FHFA Scenario 3) “As a result of restricted access to credit and continuing high unemployment, the moderate
rebound in housing construction that occurred over the first half of 2009 not only pauses but reverses course." The peak-to-trough decline is 45%. From the trough in 1Q12 to the end of the forecast period house prices increase by 11%.

My current projection is for further house price declines of 5% to 10%, as measured by the Case-Shiller and Corelogic repeat sales indexes. That would put the peak-to-trough decline around 36% or so. So my guess is somewhere between scenarios 2 & 3.

And this graph shows the projected draws for each of the above scenarios.

My guess is the draw will be somewhat over scenario 2, but well below the FHFA's scenario 3.

by Calculated Risk on 10/21/2010 10:00:00 AM

Here is the Philadelphia Fed Index: Business Outlook Survey

Results from the Business Outlook Survey suggest that regional manufacturing activity was steady in October. Although the broad survey measures showed marginal improvement this month, the new orders index continued to suggest weak demand for manufactured goods.
...
The survey’s broadest measure of manufacturing conditions, the diffusion index of current activity, increased from a reading of –0.7 in September to 1.0 in October. The index had been negative for two consecutive months (see Chart). Indexes for new orders and shipments continued to indicate weakness this month: The new orders index increased 3 points but remained negative for the fourth consecutive month.
...
Firms reported near steady employment again this month, but lower average work hours for existing employees. The percentage of firms reporting increases in employment (20 percent) narrowly edged out the percentage of firms reporting decreases (17 percent). The index for employment was slightly positive for the second consecutive month but increased just 1 point. Indicative of still weak activity, more firms reported declines in average work hours for existing employees (22 percent) than reported increases (16 percent).emphasis added

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the Philly index for the last 40 years.

This index turned down sharply in June and July and was negative in August and September (indicating contraction). The index was barely positive in October, and the internals (new orders, employment) are still weak.

These surveys are timely, but noisy. However this is further evidence of a slowdown in manufacturing. This was slightly worse than the consensus view of a reading of 1.8 (slight expansion).

by Calculated Risk on 10/21/2010 08:40:00 AM

The DOL reports on weekly unemployment insurance claims:

In the week ending Oct. 16, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 452,000, a decrease of 23,000 from the previous week's revised figure of 475,000 [revised up from 462,000]. The 4-week moving average was 458,000, a decrease of 4,250 from the previous week's revised average of 462,250.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the 4-week moving average of weekly claims since January 2000.

The dashed line on the graph is the current 4-week average. The four-week average of weekly unemployment claims decreased this week by 4,250 to 458,000.

The 4-week moving average has been moving sideways at an elevated level since last December - almost a year - and that suggests a weak job market.

Note: most revisions have been slightly up over the last year or so. The average revision has been up just over 2,000, but the revision last week was up 13,000.

by Calculated Risk on 10/20/2010 10:56:00 PM

From Nick Timiraos at the WSJ: Regulator for Fannie Set to Get Litigious

[The FHFA] hired a law firm specializing in litigation as the agency considers how to move forward with efforts to recoup billions of dollars on soured mortgage-backed securities purchased from banks and Wall Street firms.
...
In a statement, the FHFA said it is analyzing requested information and that "no decisions for future action have been made."

Back in July, the Federal Housing Finance Agency announced: FHFA Issues Subpoenas for PLS Documents

FHFA, as Conservator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the Enterprises), has issued 64 subpoenas to various entities, seeking documents related to private-label mortgage-backed securities (PLS) in which the two Enterprises invested. The documents will enable the FHFA to determine whether PLS issuers and others are liable to the Enterprises for certain losses they have suffered on PLS.

The GSEs have a huge advantage over other investors because the FHFA can issue subpoenas. The article mentions estimates that the banks could face put-backs ranging from $24 billion to as high as $179 billion. Quite a range and the actual amount will probably be towards the lower end of the range, and this will play out over a long period (unless there is a settlement).

Note: It is difficult for private investors to obtain the actual loan documents - and that is one of the hurdles the investors asking BofA to repurchase loans need to overcome. Yves Smith at Naked Capitalism points out some of the difficulties: More on Why the PIMCO, BlackRock, Freddie, NY Fed Letter to Countrywide on Putbacks Is Way Overhyped. However the private investors can obtain the required voting rights (usually 25% to 50% depending on the deal), and essentially force the trustee to make the servicer turnover the loan documentation. As I mentioned last night, put-backs could be a big issue for the banks, although I think it will play out over several years and not be a serious issue for the economy.

by Calculated Risk on 10/20/2010 07:03:00 PM

Just a little color ... this sounds like a sluggish recovery with little new investment. The following comments from Comerica and Wells Fargo on Commercial & Industrial (C&I) lending this morning are mixed. Perhaps a little improvement, but not much. Here are the excerpts from the transcripts (ht Brian).

From Comerica Incorporated conference call:

Analyst: Can you talk about what you saw from your more traditional borrowers during the quarter? Any signs of lines being drawn down or increased optimism?

Dale Green, EVP, Comerica: Yeah, this is Dale. Number one, as we indicated, the usage was up a bit from about 45% to about 46%, it’s good to see that. We haven’t seen that in a while. If you look at the backlogs and you look at the growth from new customers, and increases to existing customers, it’s kind of spread across most of our businesses. Currently the dealer business is showing growth. The energy business has indicated they are showing growth, those backlogs continue to look good, and what we call the commitments to commit, or the approved deals that we’re waiting to close are up rather substantially this quarter over last quarter, and again, that’s generally across most of the segments. Middle market, technology and life sciences, and so forth. So the quality of the backlog, if you will, is good in the sense that there are more deals that have been approved that are waiting to close, and the level of activity is generally a little better than it’s been. So I would say that we are cautiously optimistic, but you know, this is an uncertain time. So while we’re seeing some improvements, and we’re happy to see it, we’re happy to see better usage, there’s still an economy here that most business people will tell you is concerning, troubling, uncertain.
...
Analyst: I know you talked about utilization rate and everything in terms of demand firming up on commercial lending, but just trying to get an idea of how soon we can see growth commercial offset so CRE roll off in terms of loan growth.

Dale Greene: I hope soon, but the reality is that number one, in terms of new CRE types of opportunities, there are very few new opportunities, so we’ll continue to see the run off of the commercial real estate book as part of a design, if you will. Clearly, as we talked about before, is I had one against growth. While we are seeing some positive trends in the non-CRE, the rest of the C & I book – it’s still very difficult to predict, because there’s just that uncertainty, and so I wouldn’t sit here and tell you exactly when you might see it. It might be a while. I mean, John talked about unemployment rates, and the growth and the economy still being on very muted labels. I don’t know that that’s going to change anytime in the near term, therefore, what we’re doing is the things we’ve done for years. We’re calling on customers, we’re calling on prospects, we’re looking for the core middle market opportunities, particularly in Texas and California. We have loads of good opportunities, we have a better quality backlog, but it will take some time, I think, to see any significant growth, if you will, in the C & I book. It’s just going to be sort of ongoing, quarter to quarter, a block and a tackle kind of an effort.

Ralph Babb, CEO: As Dale was mentioning, we’re staying very close to our customers, and what we’re hearing from our customers, and we have a lot of customers who are doing very well. They are not, because of the uncertainty in the economy, and other things that affect their particular business, investing for the future. They’re really taking care of what’s happening today, and until there is a confidence factor build out there along with the economy showing a steady improvement, I don’t think you’re going to see loans consistently pick up in the industry. You monitor the numbers, I’m sure, just like we do, as to how the industry in total is working. We saw a little bit of that in Q1 and Q2, where things began to pick up, and then all of a sudden the economy slowed back down again, and the estimates that I’ve heard and look at, over the next couple of quarters and into next year, are not significant in pickup. I hope that that’s not correct.

And from Wells Fargo:

Analyst: So what is the percentage of the C&I loan utilization? I will use that as a measure for how much loan demand there is. What is your feeling about loan demand?

WFC CFO: Roughly in the low 30s on commercial line utilization, and that has been relatively consistent for a couple of quarters now. Again as we say, we are seeing somewhat increased activity, but it is not as robust as we would like to see it be. As I said we think we are picking up market share because we have got so many relationships and all the other cross-sell. So we'll just have to see when demand comes back.

WFC CEO: One of the keys, is our increase in commitments is much greater than what is happening in the portfolio, the outstandings. So we are making investments today, spending money today, to win new clients, service existing clients, that we're not seeing the benefit of yet.

by Calculated Risk on 10/20/2010 04:06:00 PM

From Economix: Answers to Your Questions on the Foreclosure Crisis. Here is one:

Q: Is it the case that many foreclosures are initiated by processors who receive high fees for foreclosing and have no incentive to pursue workouts of loans? — hmgbird, Virginia

A. For mortgage servicers who also own (or whose company also owns) the loans, the answer is no, at least in instances where a loan workout is expected to result in lower losses than foreclosing on a home.

For mortgage servicers who service loans for others, the answer is a bit trickier.

In theory, such servicers are supposed to work to minimize losses for the investors for whom they service loans. In practice, however, many so called “third-party” servicers, especially the “mega” servicers, were not adequately staffed to handle effectively the surge in problem loans, which to deal with effectively requires many more resources/staff than is the case just for processing loan payments.

For these servicers, it is not always possible to recoup the costs associated with the massive staff increases and systems changes needed to develop effective loss mitigation/workout strategies from investors, while recouping costs by just doing things the “old” way and foreclosing on properties has been relatively straightforward. So ... the net answer is “in some cases, yes.”

There are several more questions at Economix.

by Calculated Risk on 10/20/2010 02:00:00 PM

Note: This is based on information collected on or before October 8, 2010.

From the Federal Reserve: Beige book

Reports from the twelve Federal Reserve Districts suggest that, on balance, national economic activity continued to rise, albeit at a modest pace, during the reporting period from September to early October.
...
Manufacturing activity continued to expand, and several Districts reported gains in production or new orders across a wide range of industries. The only exceptions were the Philadelphia and Richmond Districts, where activity softened compared with the previous reporting period. Exports boosted manufacturing activity according to contacts in the Cleveland, Chicago, and Kansas City Districts.

And on real estate:

Housing markets remained weak. Most District Beige Book reports suggested overall home sales were sluggish or declining and were below year-ago levels. ... Single-family construction activity was at very low levels, but had improved somewhat in the Chicago, St. Louis, and Kansas City Districts. ... Respondents' outlooks suggested sales and construction would remain subdued through year-end.
...
Conditions in the commercial real estate sector remained subdued. Reports suggested rental rates continued to decline for most commercial property types. The one exception was the apartment sector, where higher leasing activity led to fewer concessions, most notably in Manhattan. Office, industrial and retail rental markets remained weak ... Industry contacts appeared to believe that the commercial real estate and construction sectors would remain weak for some time.

Pretty weak, but still growing in September and early October.

by Calculated Risk on 10/20/2010 11:08:00 AM

From the Wells Fargo conference call (ht Brian):

Let me shift to give you an overview of the foreclosure and mortgage securitization issues. These are issues obviously that are very important to consumers, mortgage investors, and shareholders. But we believe that these issues have been somewhat overstated and, to a certain extent, misrepresented in the marketplace.

I would like to be clear here on how they impact Wells Fargo specifically. So starting on slide 26 first [previous post], as John already mentioned , foreclosure at Wells Fargo is a last resort , not a first resort . We work very early with customers who are beginning to experience problems paying their mortgages and continue to do so for the length of time that the problems are being experienced.

80% of customers who are 60 days or more delinquent work with us, and when they do we are successful in helping seven out of every 10 avoid foreclosure. We attempt to contact customers on average over 75 times by phone and nearly 50 times by letter during the roughly 16 months that it takes for foreclosures to be completed once a borrower becomes (technical difficulty ).

Second, our foreclosure and securitization policies, practices, and controls in our view, are sound. To help ensure accuracy over the years, Wells Fargo has built control processes that link customer information with foreclosure procedures and documentation requirements . Our process specifies that affidavit signers and reviewers are the same team member, not different people, and affidavits are properly notarized. Not all banks in our understanding do it this way. If we find errors, we fix them; promptly as we can. We ensure loans in foreclosure are assigned to the appropriate party as necessary to comply with local laws and investor requirements.

And on servicing fees:

Analyst: We are reading all of these headlines that are impacting the mortgage business in one way or another, I guess the thing that jumps out to me is the servicing business really hasn't been priced for what we are seeing right now. Maybe the cost to you in the repurchase is a little bit less; but for some other competitors it seems like it is going to be a pretty high cost. So how do you think about just pricing I guess on the origination side as well as on the servicing side for your current production and going forward?

WFC CEO: We're always looking at -- as we are looking at this business, first of all there is great scale here. You're right with your comments that when you have problem portfolios it costs more money. ...

Analyst: I guess what I'm getting at is the servicing fees that you get as an industry I think are relatively modest to probably what some of the costs are either to modify some of these loans -- obviously the foreclosure process. So it just feels that that is going to be a much bigger burden for the business going forward, and it might make sense to start repricing some of that business right now.

WFC CFO: The industry might do that, and of course we look at that. But clearly for the 8% that is past due, that is expensive. There is no question about that. But you got to look at a whole, at a portfolio -- from a portfolio perspective. The industry will react to it. If this is a prolonged issue, I am sure new servicing will -- might be considered differently.

The analyst seems to be asking if Wells Fargo is considering increasing their servicing fee. It is important to remember that servicing is counter-cyclical and that these are the worst of times for servicers. Not only are foreclosures up, but they are also seeing a high level of refinancing because of low mortgage rates (and each loan has an upfront fixed cost, so the servicers sometimes doesn't have time to recoup the upfront costs). But during more normal times, servicing is a real cash cow for the industry - and any increase would suggest insufficient competition and should be opposed by regulators.

by Calculated Risk on 10/20/2010 10:49:00 AM

From Wells Fargo:

“With respect to recent industry-wide foreclosure issues, there are several important facts to know about Wells Fargo. Foreclosure is always a last resort, and we work hard to find other solutions through multiple discussions with customers over many months before proceeding to foreclosure. We are confident that our practices, procedures and documentation for both foreclosures and mortgage securitizations are sound and accurate. For these reasons, we did not, and have no plans to, initiate a moratorium on foreclosures."

And a couple of pages from the Quarterly Supplement:

Click on slide for larger image in new window.

Here is the slide from the Wells Fargo supplement. Not only are they arguing that their foreclosure process and procedures are "sound", but they argue that "Legal documents related to securitization properly transferred ownership".

However last week the Financial Times reported:

In a sworn deposition on March 9 seen by the FT, Xee Moua, identified in court documents as a vice-president of loan documentation for Wells, said she signed as many as 500 foreclosure-related papers a day on behalf of the bank.

Ms Moua ... said that the only information she verified was whether her name and title appeared correctly ... Asked whether she checked the accuracy of the principal and interest that Wells claimed the borrower owed – a crucial step in banks’ legal actions to repossess homes – Ms Moua said: “I do not.”
excerpt with permission

Note: I'm not analyzing Wells Fargo, just reporting on their comments.

The next slide shows the delinquency and foreclosure rates for the large servicers.

BofA (Countrywide) and JPM Chase (WaMu) have the highest combined delinquency and foreclosure rates. BofA is the largest servicer with over 14 million loans ($2.2 trillion) at the end of Q2. Wells Fargo is second with about 12 million loans ($1.8 trillion), and JPM Chase is third with about 9.5 million loans ($1.35 trillion).