In Depth Analysis: CalculatedRisk Newsletter on Real Estate (Ad Free) Read it here.

Saturday, September 05, 2009

When Will the Unemployment Rate hit 10%?

by Calculated Risk on 9/05/2009 07:25:00 PM

Although the unemployment rate is noisy month-to-month, we can use the graph and formula from Unemployment and Net Jobs to guess when the unemployment rate will reach 10%.

This graph from that previous posts shows the quarterly change in net jobs (on the x-axis) as a percentage of the civilian workforce, and the change in the unemployment rate on the y-axis.

The data is for the last 40 years: 1969 through Q2 2009.

Unemployment Net Jobs Quarterly Click on graph for larger image in new window.

The Red squares are for 2008, and for the first two quarters of 2009.

The U-3 headline unemployment rate for August was reported at 9.7% (this is actually rounded up from 9.66%).

If net job losses average over 200 thousand per month, the unemployment rate will probably hit 10% in October.

If net job losses average 100 to 200 thousand per month, the unemployment rate will probably reach 10% in November.

With 50 thousand net job losses per month, it will probably take until December.

And if the economy averages zero net job losses per month, the unemployment rate will probably hit 10% in January or so.

These are just estimates - the series is noisy month-to-month - and it is possible the unemployment rate could hit 10% this month.

As I noted previously, this graph also suggests the economy needs to be adding about 0.33 percent of the civilian workforce per quarter to keep the unemployment rate from rising. That is about 170 thousand net jobs per month. Note: The civilian workforce in August was 154.6 million. 0.33% of 154.6 million is 510 thousand jobs per quarter or 170 thousand per month.

Note that the trend line is a 2nd order polynomial (equation on graph). When the economy starts to add jobs, more people start looking for work - and the relationship between net jobs and unemployment rate is not linear.

Housing Starts and the Unemployment Rate

by Calculated Risk on 9/05/2009 01:49:00 PM

Here is an update. See the post last month for much more discussion ...

Housing Starts and Unemployment Rate Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows housing starts (both total and single unit) and unemployment (inverted).

You can see both the correlaton and the lag. The lag is usually about 12 to 18 months, with peak correlation at a lag of 16 months for single unit starts. The 2001 recession was a business investment led recession, and the pattern didn't hold.

This suggests unemployment might peak in Spring 2010.

Platinum and Taylor, Bean & Whitaker

by Calculated Risk on 9/05/2009 10:45:00 AM

From the WSJ: Failed Illinois Bank Has Ties to Fallen Mortgage Executive

The Illinois connection to Mr. Farkas' now-bankrupt mortgage banking empire of Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp. was Rolling Meadows, Ill.-based Platinum Community Bank, which went down Friday with assets of $345.6 million and deposits of $305 million.
...
After acquiring Platinum, located in Chicago's northwest suburbs, Mr. Farkas sent an email to his staff in October 2008 saying the purchase was "without a doubt the MOST IMPORTANT acquisition we have ever made and offers opportunity for (Taylor Bean) to grow and prosper." Eventually, he said, Platinum would help "fund new production thereby eliminating funding challenges in the future. And it will lessen our reliance on other banks that have hampered our operations in the past." He also wrote that it was "imperative" for employees to set up personal bank accounts at Platinum.
Nice.

NY Times: One-sixth of Construction Loans in Trouble

by Calculated Risk on 9/05/2009 07:59:00 AM

From Floyd Norris at the NY Times: Construction Loans Falter, a Bad Omen for Banks

Reports filed by banks with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation indicate that at the end of June about one-sixth of all construction loans were in trouble. With more than half a trillion dollars in such loans outstanding, that represents a source of major losses for banks.
...
It is in commercial real estate construction — be it stores or office buildings — that the pain seems likely to rise. At the end of June, $291 billion in such loans was outstanding, down only a few billion from the peak reached earlier this year.

“On the commercial side,” said Matthew Anderson, a partner in Foresight Analytics, a research firm based in Oakland, Calif., “I think we are fairly early in the down cycle.”
See the great charts in the article.

The article makes the point that the local and regional banks were unable to compete with the larger banks for credit card loans (and residential mortgages too). So the smaller banks ended up overweighted in Construction & Development (C&D) and CRE loans. That isn't look good now, and most of the bank failures during the next couple of years will probably be because of CRE and C&D defaults.

I was looking back at some old posts, and I started writing about how CRE typically follows residential real estate back in 2006, and also about the excessive C&D and CRE loans concentrations of local and regional banks. Here is an excerpt from a post in March 2007:
The housing crisis is now front page news, but there is little discussion about U.S. bank exposure to CRE loans. If a CRE slump follows the residential real estate bust (the typical historical pattern), then the U.S. commercial banks might have a serious problem.
The pattern is always the same: residential leads, CRE follows. And some lenders (and developers) never learn.

Friday, September 04, 2009

SEC Chairman Madoff? Corus and More

by Calculated Risk on 9/04/2009 09:55:00 PM

A few posts earlier today:

  • Problem Bank List (Unofficial) Sep 4, 2009 (5 more banks failed today)
  • Employment Report: 216K Jobs Lost, 9.7% Unemployment Rate
  • Unemployment: Stress Tests, Unemployed over 26 Weeks, Diffusion Index
  • Employment-Population Ratio, Part Time Workers, Average Workweek

    From the SEC: Investigation of Failure of the SEC to Uncover Bernard Madoff’s Ponzi Scheme - Public Version - :
    The other NERO examiner noted that “[a]ll throughout the examination, Bernard Madoff would drop the names of high-up people in the SEC.” Madoff told them that Christopher Cox was going to be the next Chairman of the SEC a few weeks prior to Cox being officially named. He also told them that Madoff himself “was on the short list” to be the next Chairman of the SEC.
    emphasis added
    Note: first posted at the WSJ Washington Wire.

    The Corus auditor resigned. From a SEC 8-K filing today (ht jb):
    On August 31, 2009, Corus Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”), received notification from Ernst & Young, LLP (“E&Y”) of their resignation as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.
    There was no disagreement with the auditor, but I guess E&Y isn't sticking around for the FDIC party.

    And a Cease & Desist for Granite Bank in North Carolina, from The Charlotte Observer: Bank of Granite under “cease and desist” order (ht Surferdude808)
    Regulators have placed Bank of Granite Corp. under a so-called “cease and desist” order, the bank announced this afternoon.
    But what makes this one a little unusual:
    Known for being conservative and thrifty, it was once praised by Warren Buffett as one of the best-run banks in the country.
    And here is a puzzle for you all (via Surferdude808). On the FDIC cert site, Platinum Community Bank is listed as having $148 million in assets. However, when the bank was seized today, the FDIC noted:
    Platinum Community Bank, as of August 29, 2009, had total assets of $345.6 million and total deposits of $305.0 million.
    Did this bank really more than double their assets in 60 days? (Update: probably is related to the bank holding company)

  • Bank Failure #89: First State Bank, Flagstaff, AZ

    by Calculated Risk on 9/04/2009 09:13:00 PM

    Five fail this Friday
    First State Bank falls forcefully
    Feds funds are famished.

    by Soylent Green is People

    From the FDIC: Sunwest Bank, Tustin, California, Assumes All of the Deposits of First State Bank, Flagstaff, Arizona
    First State Bank, Flagstaff, Arizona, was closed today by the Arizona Department of Financial Institutions, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. To protect the depositors, the FDIC entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with Sunwest Bank, Tustin, California, to assume all of the deposits of First State Bank.
    ...
    As of July 24, 2009, First State Bank had total assets of $105 million and total deposits of approximately $95 million. ...

    The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $47 million. .... First State Bank is the 89th FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the third in Arizona. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was Union Bank, National Association, Gilbert, on August 14, 2009.
    Five more today ... so far.

    Bank Failure #88: Community Bank, Rolling Meadows, Illinois

    by Calculated Risk on 9/04/2009 08:08:00 PM

    Lustre of pyrite
    Platinum Bank now fools gold
    Shut by tin star Fed

    by Soylent Green is People

    From the FDIC: FDIC Approves the Payout of Insured Deposits of Platinum Community Bank, Rolling Meadows, Illinois
    The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) approved the payout of the insured deposits of Platinum Community Bank, Rolling Meadows, Illinois. The bank was closed today by the Office of Thrift Supervision, which appointed the FDIC as receiver.

    The FDIC will mail customers checks for their insured funds on Tuesday, September 8. Platinum Community Bank, as of August 29, 2009, had total assets of $345.6 million and total deposits of $305.0 million.
    ...
    Platinum Community Bank is the 88th FDIC-insured institution to fail this year and the 15th in Illinois. The last bank to be closed in the state was Inbank, Oak Forest, earlier today. The FDIC estimates the cost of the failure to its Deposit Insurance Fund to be approximately $114.3 million.
    No one wanted this one. That makes four today.

    Bank Failures #86 & #87: InBank, Oak Forest, IL, Vantus Bank, Sioux City, IA

    by Calculated Risk on 9/04/2009 07:13:00 PM

    InBank, Vantus Bank
    Small fries, not big potatos
    Is a whopper next?

    by Soylent Green is People

    From the FDIC: MB Financial Bank, National Association, Chicago, Illinois, Assumes All of the Deposits of InBank, Oak Forest, Illinois
    InBank, Oak Forest, Illinois, was closed today by the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, Division of Banking, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. ...

    As of August 3, 2009, InBank had total assets of $212 million and total deposits of approximately $199 million. ...

    The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $66 million. ... InBank is the 86th FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the 14th in Illinois. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was Mutual Bank, Harvey, on July 31, 2009.
    FDIC: Great Southern Bank, Springfield, Missouri, Assumes All of the Deposits of Vantus Bank, Sioux City, Iowa
    Vantus Bank, Sioux City, Iowa, was closed today by the Office of Thrift Supervision, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. ...

    As of August 28, 2009, Vantus Bank had total assets of $458 million and total deposits of approximately $368 million. ...

    The FDIC and Great Southern Bank entered into a loss-share transaction on approximately $338 million of Vantus Bank's assets. ...

    The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $168 million. .... Vantus Bank is the 87th FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the first in Iowa. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was Hartford-Carlisle Savings Bank, Carlisle, on January 14, 2000.

    Bank Failure #85: First Bank of Kansas City, Kansas City, MO

    by Calculated Risk on 9/04/2009 06:08:00 PM

    Sweet fruits of labor
    A long weekend for resting
    Also for failure

    by Soylent Green is People

    From the FDIC: Great American Bank, De Soto, Kansas, Assumes All of the Deposits of First Bank of Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri
    First Bank of Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, was closed today by the Missouri Division of Finance, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. To protect the depositors, the FDIC entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with Great American Bank, De Soto, Kansas, to assume all of the deposits of First Bank of Kansas City.
    ...
    As of June 30, 2009, First Bank of Kansas City had total assets of $16 million and total deposits of approximately $15 million. ...

    The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $6 million. ... First Bank of Kansas City is the 85th FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the second in Missouri. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was American Sterling Bank, Sugar Creek, on April 17, 2009.
    A small one to start the day.

    Tax Credit: Mercury News Advocates Taxpayers pay $60 Thousand per Additional Home Sold

    by Calculated Risk on 9/04/2009 04:29:00 PM

    From the Mercury News: Editorial: Congress should expand $8,000 home-buyer tax credit (ht ShortCourage)

    [I]t's crucial that when Congress returns from recess next week, lawmakers extend the soon-to-expire credit through 2010. And if they want to bolster the fledgling recovery, they'll expand eligibility.

    Though the credit has helped stabilize the housing market nationally, in the pricey Bay Area, it hasn't been as helpful. ... Lifting the income caps and expanding the credit to all buyers of primary residences would nudge existing homeowners to move up. That would open up more houses in the red-hot lower end of the market, where many first-time buyers have been outbid by investors paying cash.
    ...
    The National Association of Home Builders estimates that expanding and extending the credit through 2010 would generate 500,000 additional sales ... estimated to cost $30 billion ...
    Do the math. $30 billion for an additional 500,000 sales equals $60,000 per house. Ouch.

    And forget the 500 thousand additional sales. The evidence suggests that interest is already waning (although there will be a flurry of activity at the end just like Cash-for-clunkers). My estimate is the program will cost taxpayers $100,000 per additional home sold. Not very efficient or effective.