In Depth Analysis: CalculatedRisk Newsletter on Real Estate (Ad Free) Read it here.

Friday, June 05, 2009

Miscellaneous: Market and Bank Failure

by Calculated Risk on 6/05/2009 04:02:00 PM

First the market graph from Doug:

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

The first graph is from Doug Short of dshort.com (financial planner): "Four Bad Bears".

Note that the Great Depression crash is based on the DOW; the three others are for the S&P 500.
Stock Market Crashes

And since it is BFF (bank failure friday), here is an update from Bloomberg: FDIC Closes Seized Silverton Bank After Failing to Sell Assets (ht lncolnpk, mark, ron and others)
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. will shut Georgia’s Silverton Bank, seized by regulators in May, after failing to find a buyer for the assets.

A sale is “no longer feasible” and Silverton will be sold in parts, spokesman Andrew Gray said today in an e-mailed statement. The FDIC unsuccessfully sought a buyer before the bank was taken over by regulators May 1, he said.
Silverton was seized by regulators in early May.

Consumer Credit Declines at 7% Annual Rate in April

by Calculated Risk on 6/05/2009 03:11:00 PM

From MarketWatch: U.S. consumer debt falls by $15.7 billion

Consumer credit fell by $15.7 billion, or 7.4% at an annual rate, to $2.52 trillion. It was the second largest decline in outstanding debt on record, exceeded by March's $16.6 billion drop.
Consumer Credit Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the year-over-year change in consumer credit. Consumer credit is off 1.4% over the last 12 months - however, consumer credit has declined at a 6.6% rate over the last 6 months - a record pace.

Note: Consumer credit does not include real estate debt.

Employment-Population Ratio and Part Time Workers

by Calculated Risk on 6/05/2009 01:39:00 PM

A couple more graphs based on the (un)employment report ...

Employment Population Ratio Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph show the employment-population ratio; this is the ratio of employed Americans to the adult population.

Note: the graph doesn't start at zero to better show the change.

The general upward trend from the early '60s was mostly due to women entering the workforce. As an example, in 1964 women were about 32% of the workforce, today the percentage is close to 50%.

This measure is at the lowest level since the early '80s and shows the weak recovery following the 2001 recession - and the current cliff diving!

From the BLS report:

The number of persons working part time for economic reasons (sometimes referred to as involuntary part-time workers) was little changed in May at 9.1 million. The number of such workers has risen by 4.4 million during the recession.
Note: "This category includes persons who would like to work full time but were working part time because their hours had been cut back or because they were unable to find full-time jobs."

Part Time WorkersNot only has the unemployment rate risen sharply to 9.4%, but the number of workers only able to find part time jobs (or have had their hours cut for economic reasons) is now at a record 9.1 million.

Of course the U.S. population is significantly larger today (about 305 million) than in the early '80s (about 228 million) when the number of part time workers almost reached 7 million. That is the equivalent of about 9.3 million today, so population adjusted this isn't quite a record.

Earlier employment posts today:
  • Employment Report: 345K Jobs Lost, 9.4% Unemployment Rate for graphs of unemployment rate and a comparison to previous recessions.
  • Unemployment Compared to Stress Test Scenarios, and Diffusion Index
  • Rising Rates: The Next Fed Meeting Will be Interesting

    by Calculated Risk on 6/05/2009 12:04:00 PM

    First from Reuters: Fed's Lockhart: Can't wait too long to tighten (ht Alan)

    The Federal Reserve needs to be "anticipatory" and not wait too long to tighten monetary policy, Atlanta Fed President Dennis Lockhart said in an interview published on Friday. ... Lockhart is a voter on the Fed's policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee, which meets June 23-24.
    This is similar to the comments of Kansas Fed President Thomas Hoenig on Wednesday.

    Yields are rising across the board, with the Ten Year yield at 3.84%.

    This will push mortgage rates higher ... here is a scatter graph I posted last month showing the relationship between the Ten Year yield and 30 year mortgage rates.

    30 Year Mortgage Rates vs. Ten Year Treasury Yield Click on graph for larger image in new window.

    This graph shows the relationship between the Ten Year yield (x-axis) and the 30 year mortgage rate (y-axis, monthly from Freddie Mac) since 1971. The relationship isn't perfect, but the correlation is very high.

    Based on this historical data, a Ten Year yield at 3.84% suggests a 30 year mortgage rate of around 5.75%.

    Freddie Mac reported that 30 year mortgage rates were at 5.29% for the week ending June 4th, and the MBA reported rates at 5.25% for the week ending May 29th. These rates should jump again next week putting pressure on the Fed.

    Unemployment Compared to Stress Test Scenarios, and Diffusion Index

    by Calculated Risk on 6/05/2009 09:30:00 AM

    Note: earlier Employment post: Employment Report: 345K Jobs Lost, 9.4% Unemployment Rate.

    Stress Test Unemployment Rate Click on graph for larger image in new window.

    This graph shows the unemployment rate compared to the stress test economic scenarios on a quarterly basis as provided by the regulators to the banks (no link).

    This is a quarterly forecast: in Q1 the unemployment rate was higher than the "more adverse" scenario. The Unemployment Rate in Q2 (only two months) is already higher than the "more adverse" scenario, and will probably rise further in June.

    Note also that the unemployment rate has already exceeded the peak of the "baseline scenario".

    Here is a look at how "widespread" the job losses are using the employment diffusion index from the BLS.

    In May, job losses continued to be widespread across major industry sectors. Steep job losses continued in manufacturing, while the rate of decline moderated in several industries, including construction, professional and business services, and retail trade.
    BLS, April Employment Report
    Employment Diffusion IndexThe BLS diffusion index is a measure of how widespread changes in employment are. Some people think it measures the percent of industries increasing employment, but that isn't quite correct.

    From the BLS handbook:
    The diffusion indexes for private nonfarm payroll employment are based on estimates for 278 industries, while the manufacturing indexes are based on estimates for 84 industries. Each component series is assigned a value of 0, 50, or 100 percent, depending on whether its employment showed a decrease, no change, or an increase over a given period. The average (mean) value is then calculated, and this percent is the diffusion index number.
    Think of this as a measure of how widespread the job losses are across industries. The further from 50 (above or below), the more widespread the job losses or gains reported by the BLS.

    Before September, the all industries employment diffusion index was close to 40, suggesting that job losses were limited to a few industries. However starting in September the diffusion index plummeted. In December, the index hit 20.5, suggesting job losses were very widespread. The index has recovered since then (32.7 in May), suggesting job losses are less widespread.

    The manufacturing diffusion index has fallen even further, from 40 in May 2008 to just 6 in January 2009. The manufacturing index is still very low at 12, and manufacturing employment is still getting hit hard:
    Steep job losses continued in manufacturing, while declines moderated in construction and several service-providing industries.

    Employment Report: 345K Jobs Lost, 9.4% Unemployment Rate

    by Calculated Risk on 6/05/2009 08:30:00 AM

    From the BLS:

    Nonfarm payroll employment fell by 345,000 in May, about half the average monthly decline for the prior 6 months, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. The unemployment rate continued to rise, increasing from 8.9 to 9.4 percent.

    Steep job losses continued in manufacturing, while declines moderated in construction and several service-providing industries.
    Employment Measures and Recessions Click on graph for larger image.

    This graph shows the unemployment rate and the year over year change in employment vs. recessions.

    Nonfarm payrolls decreased by 345,000 in May. The economy has lost almost 3.6 million jobs over the last 6 months, and over 6 million jobs during the 17 consecutive months of job losses.

    The unemployment rate rose to 9.4 percent; the highest level since 1983.

    Year over year employment is strongly negative (there were 5.4 million fewer Americans employed in May 2009 than in May 2008).

    Percent Job Losses During Recessions The second graph shows the job losses from the start of the employment recession, in percentage terms (as opposed to the number of jobs lost).

    For the current recession, employment peaked in December 2007, and this recession was a slow starter (in terms of job losses and declines in GDP).

    However job losses have really picked up over the last 8 months (4.6 million jobs lost, red line cliff diving on the graph), and the current recession is now one of the worst recessions since WWII in percentage terms - although not in terms of the unemployment rate.

    This is another weak employment report ... more soon.

    Thursday, June 04, 2009

    Mish Speaks at Google

    by Calculated Risk on 6/04/2009 10:17:00 PM

    Here is a video of Mish from Global Economic Analysis giving a talk at Google (most Q&A). Yes, I helped him get started ...

    Update: To be clear, I disagree with Mish on many points. I didn't want to turn this into a debate ...

    S&P on CMBS: Potential Downgrades from AAA to A

    by Calculated Risk on 6/04/2009 07:26:00 PM

    S&P put out a report this afternoon: The Potential Rating Impact Of Proposed Methodology Changes On U.S. CMBS. A few excerpts:

    In our preliminary review of outstanding transactions, there were a number of recent-vintage transactions that required 'AAA' credit enhancement of more than 30% using our 'AAA' stress, which implies that super-senior classes within those deals would be downgraded.
    ...
  • Transactions from the 2007 vintage are likely to experience the greatest impact if the criteria are adopted, as most tranches currently rated 'AAA' with 30% credit enhancement ("super dupers") would likely be downgraded. The downgraded classes would have a weighted average rating (WAR) of 'A'.
    ...
  • Shorter weighted-average life 'AAA' classes benefit from structural protection and would likely perform better than longer-weighted average life 'AAA' classes. Of the A-2 (five-year) classes from 2005-2007, 25% of the 2005 deals (12 classes, 12 transactions), 10% of the 2006 deals (five classes, four transactions), and 25% of the 2007 deals (15 classes, 13 transactions) are potentially at risk for downgrade based on our analysis.
    ...
    Ten-year super-duper (30% credit-enhanced) classes have a higher potential for downgrades than the shorter weighted-average life classes: 50% (2005), 85% (2006), and 95% (2007) of the super-duper 'AAA' tranches would likely be at risk.
  • Note: This appears to be a change from the request for comments issued May 26th, but it really isn't. In the request for comment S&P stated: “approximately 25%, 60%, and 90% of the most senior tranches (by count) within the 2005, 2006, and 2007 vintages, respectively, may be downgraded.” However that included both shorter and longer weighted-average life classes. It is the Ten-year super dupers that will be hit the hardest.

    NY Fed President on PPIP

    by Calculated Risk on 6/04/2009 05:47:00 PM

    From Bloomberg: Dudley’s TALF Comments Add Signs of a PPIP Stall (ht Brian, Bob_in_MA)

    The Federal Reserve may not start lending against residential mortgage-backed securities under its Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility, Federal Reserve Bank of New York President William Dudley indicated.

    “We’re still in the process of assessing whether a legacy RMBS program is feasible, and if it were feasible, whether it would be significant enough to make a major impact,” Dudley said at a conference today ... His comments add to signs that Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner’s Public-Private Investment Program to boost debt prices and rid banks of devalued assets to expand lending is stalling
    From the Financial Times: Fed damps hopes on mortgage-backed securities
    The US Federal Reserve on Thursday damped expectations that it was preparing to prop up the market for distressed bubble-era securities backed by mortgages.

    Hopes that the Fed would in the coming months start providing financing to investors seeking to buy residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) – many of which have lost their triple A credit ratings – have pushed prices on these assets higher in recent months.

    William Dudley, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, said on Thursday that a decision had not been made. “We have not made a final decision on whether it is doable and, if it is doable, whether it is worth the cost,” he said.

    Record High Yield Curve, Rising Mortgage Rates

    by Calculated Risk on 6/04/2009 03:23:00 PM

    The difference in yields between Treasury two- and 10-year notes widened to a record again today ... The so-called yield curve steepened to 2.79 percentage points, surpassing the previous record of 2.75 percentage points set last week. The previous record was 2.74 on Aug. 13, 2003.

    Yield Curve Click on graph for larger image in new window.

    This graph shows the difference between the ten- and two-year yields.

    Usually a steep yield curve precedes a period of decent growth, but several analysts suggest the current ten year sell-off is due to concerns about increased Treasury issuance to finance the deficit. Whatever the reason, mortgage rates higher are moving higher, from Freddie Mac: Mortgage Rates Climb in Response to Recent Rise in Bond Yields

    Freddie Mac (today released the results of its Primary Mortgage Market Survey® (PMMS®) in which the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage (FRM) averaged 5.29 percent with an average 0.7 point for the week ending June 4, 2009, up from last week when it averaged 4.91 percent. Last year at this time, the 30-year FRM averaged 6.09 percent.
    ...
    "30-year fixed-rate mortgage rates caught up to the recent rise in long-term bond yields this week to reach a 25-week high," said Frank Nothaft, Freddie Mac vice president and chief economist."
    Update: From Bloomberg: Treasuries Fall as Claims Drop Suggests Worst of Slump Ending (ht speed)
    Yields on 10-year notes approached a six-month high ... The difference between two- and 10-year notes steepened to a record 2.793 percentage points as the U.S. announced it would auction $30 billion in 10- and 30-year securities next week.
    ...
    The increase in Treasury yields have also driven rates on mortgage-backed bonds higher, leading holders of the securities to sell U.S. debt used as a hedge to protect portfolios against rising interest rates. The same trade helped drive 10-year Treasury yields to 3.75 percent last week, the highest since November.

    “There is mortgage selling going on,” Mizuho’s Combias said. “The volatility is causing all the big mortgage portfolios to have to hedge.”

    Yields on Washington-based Fannie Mae’s current-coupon 30- year fixed-rate mortgage bonds rose 19 basis points to 4.72 percent, up from 3.94 percent on May 20.