by Calculated Risk on 6/30/2005 11:16:00 AM

According to MSNBC:

The Bank of England's attempt to bring Britain's highflying economy in for a soft landing is starting to reach the nail-biting stage.

Fears are growing, even within the BOE, that consumer spending is faltering in response to past hikes in interest rates and soaring energy bills.

Of course less consumer spending is also related to the deflating housing bubble:

At the center of the drama is Britain's housing bubble, which began to lose air in the second half of last year. Although the growth rate of house prices has slowed sharply, a generally healthy economy has helped to allay worries over a collapse. Now the economic outlook is dimming.

In particular, consumers are pulling back more than anticipated.

Housing slows, consumers retrench, and then the job market starts to soften:

The newest concern is the labor markets. In May the number of workers claiming jobless benefits rose for the fourth month in a row. That hasn't happened since 1993, and it could be a harbinger of softer job markets. Wage growth, excluding bonuses, is already slowing.

And the next step in the downward vicious cycle? Falling housing prices, followed by even less consumer spending and more job losses and then a further reduction in house prices ...

Bloomberg columnist Matthew Lynn offers a similar view: U.K. Consumers Risk Recession With New Restraint.

The U.K. consumer shows every sign of having run out of steam and the economy is teetering as a result.

British shoppers have become hypersensitive since the Bank of England increased interest rates five times from November 2003 through August 2004, and since their household debt skyrocketed to more than 1 trillion pounds ($1.82 trillion).

There may well be a lesson in that for policy makers in many other countries. Consumers who have piled up debt are far more responsive to rate changes than previously.

What used to be just a nudge on the interest-rate rudder is now sending the economy downhill. The U.K.'s growth rate has fallen in each of the past four quarters.

``The main factor has been the huge increase in household debt,'' said Stuart Thomson, a fixed-income strategist at Charles Stanley Sutherlands in Edinburgh, in a telephone interview. ``It is the highest in the developed world. So people are really getting squeezed as rates rise.''

The US has also had a "huge increase in household debt". Perhaps Britain's problems offer a glimpse of the future for the US housing market and economy.

UPDATE: Another take on UK: Economic growth weakest in 2 years

And the GDP data suggest an even greater link between the housing market and consumer spending than the BoE at first assumed, suggesting worse could be yet to come.

The saving ratio in 2004 fell to its lowest since 1963 as household spending was credited with making an even greater contribution to the economy over the last few years, before slowing in line with the housing market.

The Nationwide building society said house prices fell 0.2 percent in June, bringing the annual rate of increase to a nine-year low of 4.1 percent, compared with nearly 20 percent a year earlier.

"This obviously increases the danger that the saving ratio will rise over the coming quarters as the housing market weakens, slowing the growth of household spending even further," said Jonathan Loynes, chief economist at Capital Economics.

by Calculated Risk on 6/28/2005 07:57:00 PM

According to the article in the previous post:

Today, the agency will release new state-by-state economic profiles. Taken together, the profiles conclude that most booming U.S. housing markets are sustained by strong growth in new jobs.

"In general, that is where home prices are rising most rapidly," said Barbara Ryan, associate director of the FDIC's research division.

Here is the California profile and two graphs.


Click on graph for larger image.

Job growth in the bay area and southern California trailed the rest of the Nation.


Price appreciation outpaced income growth.

The data for California does not seem to support the FDIC's conclusion.

by Calculated Risk on 6/28/2005 07:04:00 PM

Treasury Secretary Snow appeared on CNBC today. According to FOX:

"I think in some markets housing prices have risen out of alignment with underlying earnings," Snow said. But also answering the question whether there was a housing bubble in the United States his answer was a flat-out "no."

And officials at the FDIC apparently believe that housing prices are the result of strong job growth. From this article:

Top officials at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC), which regulates national banks, yesterday dismissed fears that rising home prices nationwide reflect a speculative bubble ready to burst.
...
Today, the agency will release new state-by-state economic profiles. Taken together, the profiles conclude that most booming U.S. housing markets are sustained by strong growth in new jobs.

"In general, that is where home prices are rising most rapidly," said Barbara Ryan, associate director of the FDIC's research division.

Here are the FDIC State Profiles.

Snow also commented on Oil prices:

"Energy prices are way too high," Snow said on CNBC television. "Clearly, it's hurting."

"Clearly, energy prices serve as a tax, they reduce the disposable income available to do other things and they take some oxygen out of the economy," Snow said. "Energy is my concern. I think energy is the biggest concern," he added.

But Snow said the U.S. economy is currently managing to withstand the "headwinds" of oil at $60 a barrel. When asked if these energy prices portend a recession, Snow said: "No. I don't see it derailing the strong recovery we're in ... but it does take a few tenths of a (percentage) point off GDP growth, that's for sure."

Don't worry, be happy!

by Calculated Risk on 6/27/2005 10:44:00 PM

From the Financial Times, the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) warned Monday that "growing domestic and international debt has created the conditions for global economic and financial crises".

UPDATE: Macroblog links to the BIS report with key excerpts.

The Basel-based organisation's annual report said no one could predict if and when such international economic imbalances would unravel but "time might well be running out".

The BIS urged the US to act first:

"Given the size of the [US] government deficit, the obvious first step would be to cut expenditures and raise taxes"...

Without a smaller budget deficit, lower private sector consumption and higher savings, there was little likelihood of stabilising the ballooning US current account deficit. The ever widening deficit “could eventually lead to a disorderly decline of the dollar, associated turmoil in other financial markets, and even recession."

The report then turned pessimistic.

...the BIS report questioned the Bush administration's willingness to impose the required policies to back up its deficit reduction ambition ...

"If what needs to be done to resolve external imbalances is reasonably clear, it also seems clear that much of it is simply not going to happen in the near term."

"Time is running out" and no action will be taken "in the near term". How sad.

by Calculated Risk on 6/27/2005 02:57:00 PM

The LA Times publishes a small community newspaper for my neighborhood called the Daily Pilot. The business section of today's Pilot featured an article on housing. What caught my eye were some quotes from local real estate professionals.

"Much of the appreciation we're seeing is permanent."

John Burns, president of Irvine-based John Burns Real Estate Consulting June, 2005

Compare to:

"Stock prices have reached what looks like a permanently high plateau. I do not feel there will be soon if ever a 50 or 60 point break from present levels, such as (bears) have predicted. I expect to see the stock market a good deal higher within a few months."

Irving Fisher, Ph.D. Economics, Oct. 17, 1929

But far more discouraging are the comments attributed to Bill Cote of the Cote Realty Group. He doesn't believe there is a bubble, but he also apparently wants to withhold information from the home buying public:

[Cote]...is bothered by the potential of academics forecasting real estate deflation to discourage the public. He said it's tough for general audiences to discern between the various forecasts that are out there.

"It affects the confidence of the market -- people start talking," Cote said. "People can't tell unless they're sophisticated in economics."

"People start talking ..." We wouldn't want that to happen.

by Calculated Risk on 6/27/2005 12:22:00 AM

My latest post is up on Angry Bear: The Impact of Interest Rates on House Prices. Several people are arguing that housing prices are appropriate based on current interest rates. I argue that this is incorrect.

And from the NY Times: How Home Prices Can Be Hot but Inflation Cool. This article discusses a potential problem with the CPI calculation. When houses prices fall that might increase the reported CPI:

... when housing prices fall, a trend that most people would deem anti-inflationary, and renting becomes more attractive than owning, the index might process the information as evidence that inflation is on the rise. "We got a great deal of criticism that we were overstating inflation in the early 1990's, because housing prices were declining and rents were going up steadily," Mr. Jackman said.

And my friend Mike Shedlock is hearing "Warning bells from homebuilder suppliers".

Best to all.

by Calculated Risk on 6/24/2005 09:17:00 PM

Kash covered the political reaction to the announcement that China National Offshore Oil Corporation, or CNOOC, is bidding for Unocal. MaxSpeak and Dr. Setser work the numbers.

This event reminds me of the following cautionary tale from Warren Buffett (Oct, 2003).

[T]ake a wildly fanciful trip with me to two isolated, side-by-side islands of equal size, Squanderville and Thriftville. Land is the only capital asset on these islands, and their communities are primitive, needing only food and producing only food. Working eight hours a day, in fact, each inhabitant can produce enough food to sustain himself or herself. And for a long time that's how things go along. On each island everybody works the prescribed eight hours a day, which means that each society is self-sufficient.

Eventually, though, the industrious citizens of Thriftville decide to do some serious saving and investing, and they start to work 16 hours a day. In this mode they continue to live off the food they produce in eight hours of work but begin exporting an equal amount to their one and only trading outlet, Squanderville.

The citizens of Squanderville are ecstatic about this turn of events, since they can now live their lives free from toil but eat as well as ever. Oh, yes, there's a quid pro quo-but to the Squanders, it seems harmless: All that the Thrifts want in exchange for their food is Squanderbonds (which are denominated, naturally, in Squanderbucks). Over time Thriftville accumulates an enormous amount of these bonds, which at their core represent claim checks on the future output of Squanderville. A few pundits in Squanderville smell trouble coming. They foresee that for the Squanders both to eat and to pay off-or simply service - the debt they're piling up will eventually require them to work more than eight hours a day. But the residents of squanderville are in no mood to listen to such doom saying.

Meanwhile, the citizens of Thriftville begin to get nervous. Just how good, they ask, are the IOUs of a shiftless island? So the Thrifts change strategy: Though they continue to hold some bonds, they sell most of them to Squanderville residents for Squanderbucks and use the proceeds to buy Squanderville land. And eventually the Thrifts own all of Squanderville. At that point, the Squanders are forced to deal with an ugly equation: They must now not only return to working eight hours a day in order to eat - they have nothing left to trade - but must also work additional hours to service their debt and pay Thriftville rent on the land so imprudently sold. In effect, Squanderville has been colonized by purchase rather than conquest. It can be argued, of course, that the present value of the future production that Squanderville must forever ship to Thriftville only equates to the production Thriftville initially gave up and that therefore both have received a fair deal. But since one generation of Squanders gets the free ride and future generations pay in perpetuity for it, there are - in economist talk - some pretty dramatic "intergenerational inequities."

UPDATE: Buffett was on CNBC Thursday June 23rd. Here are his comments on China:

Buffett said he doesn't subscribe to the view that China is engaging in a trade war with the U.S. He said Chinese corporate takeovers, such as CNOOC Ltd's (CEO) recent bid for Unocal Corp. (UCL) were an "inevitable" consequence of the U.S. trade deficit. He noted that the U.S. imported far more goods from China than it sold to the nation.

"If we're going to consume more than we produce, we have to expect to give away a little bit of the country," said the "Oracle of Omaha."

by Calculated Risk on 6/24/2005 10:19:00 AM

According to a Census Bureau report, New Home Sales in May were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.298 million vs. market expectations of 1.32 million. April sales were revised down significantly to 1.271 Million.


Click on Graph for larger image.

NOTE: The graph starts at 700 thousand units per month to better show monthly variation.

Sales of new one-family houses in May 2005 were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1,298,000, according to estimates released jointly today by the U.S. Census Bureau and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. This is 2.1 percent above the revised April rate of 1,271,000 and is 4.4 percent above the May 2004 estimate of 1,243,000.



The Not Seasonally Adjusted monthly rate was 120,000 New Homes sold, up from a revised 117,000 in April.

The median sales price of new houses sold in May 2005 was $217,000; the average sales price was $281,400.



UPDATE: Add graph of median and average prices.

The average sales price is down slightly and the median price is the lowest since September of 2004.



The seasonally adjusted estimate of new houses for sale at the end of May was 442,000. This represents a supply of 4.2 months at the current sales rate.

The seasonally adjusted supply of New Homes was 4.2 months, about normal for the last few years. The supply for April was also 4.2 months, revised from 4.1 months.

New Home Sales were below Wall Street forecasts. The story is the downward revisions for March and April. Both months were originally reported as record sales, but they have been revised to be below the record of last October.

by Calculated Risk on 6/23/2005 10:24:00 PM

Warren Buffet was interviewed on CNBC today. Here are a few of his comments as reported by Dow Jones:

On The Real-Estate Bubble:

Lending practices, low interest rates, and "the psychology that ensues when an asset class moves year after year and people feel 'why didn't I get into it before?'" is creating a precarious situation in some of the real estate markets, Buffett said.

At the high end of the market, Buffett said people may regret recent purchases.

On the Dollar and the Trade Deficit:

Buffett said the trade deficit was "a deeply embedded structural problem."

The investor cited Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan in 2002, saying that countries who experience similar trade-deficit trends in the past, "invariably have run into problems."

"Eventually the current-account deficit will have to be restrained," Buffett said.

"We've gone from being a country that owned more of the rest of the world than they owned of us to a country probably $3 trillion in the hole right now in terms of our net worth position," Buffett said. "So it will have had a effect, it may be a month from now, it may be five years from now."

As a consequence of such imbalances, Buffett warned that the dollar will continue its downdraft "at some point," and indicated that he expects the dollar to be weaker five years from now.

On China:

Buffett said he doesn't subscribe to the view that China is engaging in a trade war with the U.S. He said Chinese corporate takeovers, such as CNOOC Ltd's (CEO) recent bid for Unocal Corp. (UCL) were an "inevitable" consequence of the U.S. trade deficit. He noted that the U.S. imported far more goods from China than it sold to the nation.

"If we're going to consume more than we produce, we have to expect to give away a little bit of the country," said the "Oracle of Omaha."

by Calculated Risk on 6/23/2005 11:16:00 AM

Federal Reserve Governor Mark Olson expressed concern today about "homebuying decisions premised on unrealistic rates of home appreciation":

Over the past several years, there has been an explosion of new and novel mortgage products, including mortgages that allow homeowners to skip mortgage payments (which results in increasing the size of their mortgage balance) and mortgages that allow homeowners to pay only the interest on a loan, and not the principal, for a preset period at the beginning of the life of their mortgage loan. Many of these products can be useful financial tools for homebuyers and, indeed, may have helped make homeownership more accessible for some households. But to the extent that these new mortgage products promote homebuying decisions that are premised on unrealistic rates of home appreciation, they raise concerns. Some borrowers may not be able to sustain such a loan over a long time horizon if the pace of home price growth moderates. In particular, when the payments on these novel mortgages adjust upward, the homebuyer may not be able to refinance such mortgages unless the home has increased in value.

At the same conference, according to an MSNBC article, Cleveland Fed President Sandra Pianalto cited a study:

... that found 25 percent of Americans claim to have no spare cash after covering regular expenses, warned that tapping wealth stored in the family home carries risks.

“Increasingly, home owners are using home equity as a source of ready cash ... this doesn’t bode well for the ownership society that we’re trying to build,”

In a related commentary Double bubble trouble Danielle DiMartino points out that:

Delinquency and foreclosure rates have been falling

The reason, said MBA chief economist Doug Duncan, is strong job creation.

Housing is a chief driver of job creation.

Housing is being driven by "creative loans". (see Olson's comments above)

And she concludes:

The debate reminds us that falling prices not only will coincide with higher foreclosures, they also will be accompanied by millions of pink slips.